The lure of the fabled “China market” has been enticing Western traders and companies, as well as other Asians, for centuries, an attraction that grew exponentially in the 20th century, along with China’s burgeoning population, despite political upheavals and other problems.
That it has proven to be a poisoned apple for many has failed to discourage others, and the Chinese Communist Party has learned to use access to its citizens as a cudgel to get the trade, economic, political and even military benefits it seeks.
Taiwanese have increasingly paid the price for that demand for access to the Chinese market, as governments and international corporations grow ever more reluctant to stand up to Beijing’s demands for fear of losing access, as most recently demonstrated with international airlines giving in to demands that they list the nation’s airports as being in China, despite the condemnation of many in their home nations.
However, Chinese suffer as well, although many do not realize it, as they lack the unfettered access to the rest of the world that many other nationalities take for granted, despite their newfound ability to travel to other countries.
Beijing’s Great Firewall, which censors Internet searches and blocks social media sites — except for the favored few or the censors themselves — is designed to keep them ignorant.
So it was disappointing to many Google employees, and those outside the company, to learn on Wednesday that the company has been secretly developing an Android mobile app specially designed to comply with China’s censorship rules — eight years after company founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin pulled out of China over censorship concerns.
The new app will reportedly filter Web sites blocked by the Great Firewall and blacklist queries deemed to be sensitive. The company is reportedly also working on a second app, a news aggregator, for the Chinese market as well.
For the world’s major search engine, whose raison d’entre has long been the Internet’s freedom, to take such a step is not just morally problematic, it raises major questions about freedom of information for the rest of the world as well, at a time when democracies worldwide are struggling to deal with social media manipulation by hostile governments and groups, and attacks on traditional media outlets by politicians.
It also shows a willing blindness to ignore not only world politics, but its own corporate history.
After all, Google tried playing by Beijing’s rules when it launched Google.cn in 2006, rationalizing that agreeing to censor some results was a small price to pay for “increased access to information for people in China and a more open Internet,” as it said at the time.
However, four years later, a phishing attack targeting the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights advocates led the company to end Google.cn.
Several reports about the new search app described Google chief executive Sundar Pichal as being “more pragmatic” than his predecessors about working in China, noting that the company has invested in several Chinese firms and has several apps, such as Google Translate and Files Go, for Chinese developers to use.
Pragmatic? Perhaps Pichal just has a different definition of the Google code of conduct motto: “Do the right thing.”
If the Chinese government does approve the new censor-friendly app, it will undoubtedly use the return of a Google search engine as a weapon in its propaganda war against reality.
Another worry is that Pichal might also one day find himself having to placate Beijing by weighing Google’s growing investment in artificial intelligence research and its data center in Taiwan against his investment in the Chinese market.
What will he think the right thing to do is then?
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry