For the past three years, dozens of nations have gathered each July to present their national plans to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
At the latest of these UN High-Level Political Forums, governments rolled out impressive blueprints — almost none of which included realistic budgets or revenue sources.
Estimates of the development investment gap are typically in the trillions of US dollars, while official development assistance is hovering at about US$140 billion per year.
One effective way to help close this funding gap is to catalyze substantial investment from the private sector.
The private sector has long played an integral role in poverty reduction and economic development — a role that extends well beyond finance.
Private companies create 90 percent of jobs (the most effective way to lift people out of poverty) in the developing world and facilitate improved efficiency, technological adoption and innovation, and the distribution of goods and services.
Private-sector financing of the SDGs would occur via established institutional investors, including pension funds, sovereign-wealth funds and insurers, which together represent trillions of US dollars of “patient capital.”
Yet, as it stands, institutional investors allocate only a small share of assets to so-called impact investing, while channeling huge sums toward a relatively small number of public companies.
The key to achieving the SDGs is therefore to impel public companies — especially the large firms that receive the majority of institutional investment — to account for environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria relevant to the SDGs in their decisionmaking.
This approach recognizes the need to adopt a long-term perspective when implementing the SDGs, even as we respond to their urgency.
The good news is that ESG-anchored investing is already on the rise, with most of the major institutional investors integrating ESG factors into their investment strategies, at least to some extent.
The 2016 Global Sustainable Investment Review reported that US$22.89 trillion of assets were “being professionally managed under responsible investment strategies” worldwide, up 25 percent from 2014.
Europe accounted for US$12 trillion and the US total was US$8.7 trillion, though the highest growth rates were in Japan and Oceania.
Viewing ESG awareness as a way to mitigate risk and even as a source of upside opportunities, institutional investors are seeking to bring this approach into their mainstream activities.
This bodes well for the SDGs, but there are still important challenges to overcome, beginning with an inadequate understanding of the link between ESG standards and the SDGs.
Only a few investors and businesses are currently using SDGs as the basis for sustainability-focused strategies, but the only way to boost shareholder value and contribute to meeting the SDGs is for companies and investors to ensure, in advance, that they focus on ESG standards that are both material to their industry or business and useful to advance the SDGs.
In a recent paper, Gianni Betti, Costanza Consolandi, and Robert Eccles mapped the relevant ESG issues identified by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board in 79 industries in 10 sectors, grouped by SDGs.
Companies that use this kind of mapping will understand to which SDGs they would be contributing — down to the target level — by performing well on their chosen ESG criteria.
By reviewing data on companies’ ESG performance, investors can see how their funds are contributing to achieving the SDGs.
Based on this information, they might decide to reallocate their resources or to engage with better-performing companies.
In 2016, Mozaffar Khan, George Serafeim and Aaron Yoon created portfolios of companies that were performing well and poorly on the material issues in their industry.
The firms with the highest annualized active return of 4.8 percent were performing well on the material issues and poorly on the immaterial issues.
Those with the lowest annualized active return of minus-2.2 percent were performing poorly on both, but critically, the divergences did not start to appear until after seven to eight years.
This demonstrates that executives must balance attention to short-term performance with a long-term perspective.
That includes an understanding of which ESG issues will be material to their industry in the future and which SDG efforts in those areas they might serve to advance.
Investors could consider taking a long-term view with regard to the financial performance of their ESG-based portfolios.
They can expect periodic reports on ESG performance and its contribution to the relevant SDGs — just as they receive periodic reports on financial performance — to monitor progress and make adjustments if needed.
In many ways, private firms are already contributing to the SDGs, but they are doing so in an ad hoc manner that is not adequately labeled or targeted.
By creating smart, comprehensive and clearly defined strategies, private companies can not only get credit for their efforts; they can also help governments to establish realistic budgets and clear financing plans for the SDGs.
Mahmoud Mohieldin is senior vice president at the World Bank Group and Svetlana Klimenko is the group’s lead financial management specialist.
Copyright Project Syndicate
If social media interaction is any yardstick, India remained one of the top countries for Taiwan last year. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has on several occasions expressed enthusiasm to strengthen cooperation with India, one of the 18 target nations in her administration’s New Southbound Policy. The past year was instrumental in fostering Taiwan-India ties and will be remembered for accelerated momentum in bilateral relations. However, most of it has been confined to civil society circles. Even though Taiwan launched its southbound policy in 2016, the potential of Taiwan-India engagement remains underutilized. It is crucial to identify what is obstructing greater momentum
In terms of the economic outlook for the semiconductor industry, Taiwan has outperformed the rest of the world for three consecutive years. This is quite rare. In addition, Taiwan has been playing an important role in the US-China technology dispute, and both want Taiwan on their side, reflecting the remaking of the nation’s semiconductor industry. Under the leadership of — above all — Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the industry as a whole has shifted from a focus on capacity to a focus on quality, as companies now have to be able to provide integration of hardware and software, as well as
US President Joe Biden’s foreign policy on China and the Indo-Pacific region will have huge repercussions for Taiwan. The US Department of State in the final weeks of former US president Donald Trump’s term took several actions clearly aimed to push Biden’s foreign policy to build on Trump’s achievements. Former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo’s announcement on the final day of the Trump administration that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was committing “genocide and crimes against humanity” in Xinjiang was welcome, but comes far too late. The recent dropping of “self-imposed” restrictions on meetings between Taiwanese and US officials was
In memory of Diane Baker: one of the last working dance journalists, a true dance aficionado and dear friend. On Friday, through a mutual friend, I received the shocking news that dance critic Diane Baker had passed away suddenly at her apartment in Tianmu, Taipei. The news quickly spread, and messages of concern quickly swarmed in from the dance community in Taiwan and abroad. Her sister Sharon in the US later confirmed that Diane died of a heart attack on Wednesday last week. She was 65. Diane was a dear friend to Taiwan’s dance community. Her frequent appearance at dance performances in