Rumors that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) power is waning have spread across China, all because Xi was not on the front page of the state-owned People’s Daily for a few days.
The rare disappearance occurred less than 20 days after Xi, during a meeting with US business leaders last month, boldly said that China would respond with “an eye for an eye” to the trade war.
To dispel the rumors, the People’s Daily on Tuesday last week ran four articles about him on the front page, although none of them were the lead, implying that there is some truth to the rumors.
However, it might only be a partial loss of power, rather than Xi being forced to resign, because the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) sticks to the principle of “unity against the enemy,” covering up leadership power struggles to avoid giving the outside world an advantage.
Xi’s loss of power began to show late last month, when China changed its arrogant tone and humbly admitted that it still lags far behind the international community, although such modesty is often insincere.
China is toning down its expansionist language and returning to the past strategy of “concealing its strength and biding its time,” not because of the trade war with the US, but because of the US ban on ZTE Corp, which has disrupted China’s plans to strengthen its military capacities with advanced technology.
This is why Xi is negotiating with US President Donald Trump and responding to domestic pressure by suppressing his Red Guard side.
Still, he remains recalcitrant.
However, the US is unwavering, and US Secretary of Defense James Mattis reiterated that the US “will confront China where we must” when meeting with Xi.
This is in stark contrast to Beijing’s “eye for an eye” approach, highlighting the cultural clash between the West and China.
Eventually, China has opened up 22 sectors to foreign investment. Real or not, these measures have been called “the 22 demands of betrayal,” a reference to the 21 Japanese demands that then-Republic of China president Yuan Shikai (袁世凱) accepted in 1915.
Meanwhile, a large group of “traitors” willing to cede their provinces to the US have begun to emerge.
The US’ economic and military pressure has clearly given Xi’s enemies within the CCP a boost and triggered public opposition, including a nationwide truck-driver strike and protests by retired soldiers.
On July 1, the CCP’s foundation anniversary, protesters rioted in Zhejiang Province, breaking into Jiaxing City Hall, the sacrosanct city where the CCP was formally established in 1921.
The city’s mayor is former Chinese president Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) son, Hu Haifeng (胡海峰). Shortly afterward, Dong Yaoqiong (董瑤瓊), a woman living in Shanghai, posted a live-stream video of herself pouring ink on a poster of Xi.
The video quickly spread across the nation and eventually prompted the government to remove all public images of Xi.
During the Cultural Revolution, Dong would have been sentenced to death, although Xi does not dare do that, not because he is merciful, but because he has lost his “divine powers” — after all, he is but a provincial political tyrant. Whether he is losing power or not, his cult of personality has collapsed and his throne is shaking.
What is the reason behind the sudden weakness Xi displayed in his meeting with former vice president Lien Chan (連戰)? It could mean that there might be great changes in China if the US maintains its pressure.
The upcoming leadership meeting in Beidaihe, China, will perhaps reveal the results of the dealings between the country’s top leaders.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry