Sun, Jul 15, 2018 - Page 7 News List

Media industry and Internet firms strike back against fake news

By Rob Lever  /  AFP, WASHINGTON

The viral spread of hoaxes and misinformation ahead of the US presidential election and Brexit referendum two years ago was a wake-up call for many established news media, which have gone on the offensive to shore up their credibility and help filter out fake news.

Major media organizations, often in partnership with big technology and social media firms, have stepped up fact-checking and other steps to support fact-based journalism.

However, such efforts have been complicated by unrelenting attacks on the media by US President Donald Trump and others who tend to label any unfavorable coverage “fake news.”

Fake news is as old as journalism itself and reputable media organizations have often played a role of gatekeeper to reliable information. This role has been fundamentally challenged in the fast-moving Internet age when rumors and false information can become viral, sometimes with tragic results.

In one chilling example in India, a WhatsApp rumor warning that 300 people had descended on Gujarat State looking to abduct and sell children has triggered deadly mob attacks.

Social media “has made things much worse,” because it “offers an easy route for non-journalists to bypass journalism’s gatekeepers, so that anyone can ‘publish’ anything, however biased, inaccurate or fabricated,” Illinois State University journalism professor John Huxford said.

“Journalism’s role as the ‘gatekeeper’ of what is and isn’t news has always been controversial, of course, but we’re now seeing just how bad things can get when that function breaks down,” Huxford said.

Internet firms, after initial reluctance to define themselves as “media,” have stepped up efforts to identify false news and to “curate” stories from “trusted” news sources.

“Technology companies including Apple, Google, Snapchat, Twitter and, above all, Facebook have taken on most of the functions of news organizations, becoming key players in the news ecosystem, whether they wanted that role or not,” a report by Columbia University’s Tow Center for Digital Journalism said in March.

Numerous studies have shown that fake news — often more sensational than genuine information — spreads faster online because of how social media have prioritized “virality.”

“False political news traveled deeper and more broadly, reached more people, and was more viral than any other category of false information,” a report published this year by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) said.

The MIT researchers examined 126,000 rumors spread by 3 million people and found that false news reached more people than the truth.

“Analysis found that it took the truth approximately six times as long as falsehood to reach 1,500 people,” the researchers said.

Oxford Internet Institute researchers came to a similar conclusion, citing a study that showed that on many online platforms, news is “prioritized by complex algorithms that have been coded to sort, filter, and deliver content in a manner that is designed to maximize users’ engagement.”

“The speed and scale at which content ‘goes viral’ grows exponentially, regardless of whether or not the information it contains is true,” Oxford researchers Samantha Bradshaw and Philip Howard wrote.

Huxford said that many Internet users are not adept at telling fake news from the real thing, making the role of major news organizations critical.

This story has been viewed 3237 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top