The government in February launched an online public design competition for a new national identification card. After it was announced last month, the winning design came under severe public criticism and the selection panel was enraged by the reaction.
The differences in opinion lie in focus. While netizens focused on national identity and the panel stressed design, the Ministry of the Interior never specified what the focus should be.
The winning design received only 46 votes online, while the design that received 97,498 votes was only given “the most popular” award. As the campaign was only to serve as a “reference point” for the card’s design, people said that perhaps they were just trying to keep themselves busy.
If the government really wanted to focus on design, it would have its hands full.
Taipei’s eastern area is a good example. More than 90 years ago, Germany developed a special urban design plan: Worried that roads would become blocked if everyone in skyscrapers came down at the same time, planners designed intersecting pedestrian overpasses five floors above ground to separate pedestrians from the high-speed traffic below, ensuring the safety of both.
Such designs have been realized in many bustling Japanese cities.
Years ago, I asked Taipei City Government officials if they had similar plans. They said yes and pointed to the numerous pedestrian overpasses connecting Shin Kong Mitsukoshi department stores and the Vieshow Cinemas Xinyi complex.
However, those overpasses were built by the businesses to keep customers in the shopping area, not by the city government.
In addition, there are no plans for even a single park in the area.
Admittedly, there is the park surrounding the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall at the end of Keelung Road, but that is not new, as it was Taipei Park No. 6 during the Japanese era.
Neither does Daan Forest Park (大安森林公園) look well designed. When construction began, a statue of Guanyin was preserved, so other religious groups asked for the same treatment, resulting in strong public protests.
By comparison, a team led by Frederick Olmsted, the father of US landscape architecture who was also responsible for the design of the Niagara Reservation at Niagara Falls, won a competition for their design of New York City’s Central Park.
Olmsted took great pains in planning the sculptures in the park, which boasts a great variety of sculptures and monuments, including Cleopatra’s Needle, a bronze Alice in Wonderland statue and a Strawberry Fields section in memory of John Lennon, which provide an artistic getaway from the hustle and bustle of the city.
There used to be two sculptures in the Taipei Botanical Garden: a bronze bust of Urbain Faurie — a French missionary who traveled extensively around Taiwan collecting a large amount of plant samples before dying in Taipei in 1915 — and a monument to Bunzo Hayata, the father of Taiwanese botany. Both statues went missing after World War II.
It was not until 2016 that the Taiwan Forestry Research Institute started looking for the two statues ahead of the garden’s 120th anniversary. Only the plaster cast for Faurie’s bust was found, which was used to make a replica, while the Hayata statue had to be redesigned and reforged.
If the government started to do such things, that would be worthy of praise.
Lu Ching-fu is a professor at Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Applied Arts.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with