As the FIFA World Cup unfolds, captivating soccer fans around the globe, the broad appeal of high-level sports is on full display. However, the impact of sports extends far beyond major international events, as impressive they might be, to include far-reaching benefits for ordinary people.
Initiatives that encourage people to exercise regularly can help to reduce the incidence of strokes, cancer and depression, resulting in higher productivity and lower healthcare costs. These are important goals for a region like Latin America and the Caribbean, where one in four adults is obese — a trend that has worsened over the past decade.
Sports can also strengthen social relationships by bringing together people from different backgrounds and creating a sense of shared purpose and identity.
Moreover, they can provide a productive outlet for young people, keeping them focused and engaged and boosting their self-esteem, thereby reducing their vulnerability to harmful social influences. And they can promote qualities like perseverance, teamwork and leadership — the kinds of soft skills employers seek in job candidates — while even supporting gender equality.
In short, sports programs are good for individuals, communities and countries. That is why, since 2004, the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), of which I am president, has supported sports-for-development programs for at-risk youth in 18 countries. Such programs often combine the sport itself — namely, soccer — with vocational training and internships.
The results are promising, to say the least. About 70 percent of participants complete the program; of those, more than 65 percent get formal jobs, return to school, or start a business within one year.
A project carried out in El Alto, Bolivia, used soccer to enable more than 600 girls to learn leadership and other useful life skills. Although we have only limited data on their progress, we know from other research carried out in the US that participation in sports can have long-term benefits for women, including higher educational attainment and job earnings.
Despite these benefits, Latin American and Caribbean countries spend a relatively modest 0.1 percent of GDP on sports programs with broad social goals — about one-third as much as their European counterparts.
Does this mean that these countries should increase their investment in sport?
It depends on the investment.
Not all sports programs are created equal. In Europe, researchers have found that youth recreation centers where activities are not structured sometimes become gathering places for kids involved in high-risk behavior, such as gang activity.
Highly structured programs that build strong relationships between students and their coaches or other mentors are much more effective.
For example, supervised sports programs for schoolchildren can be strengthened as part of efforts to extend the school day — an accelerating trend across Latin America and the Caribbean.
The IDB’s research and experience with sports-for-development programs supports these conclusions, indicating that the value of public investment depends on the specific strategy.
However, it is not yet clear precisely which strategies work best. Thus, to maximize the economic and social benefits of government investment in sports, policymakers need more information.
Specifically, there is a need for more experimentation, improved data collection and careful evaluation, including reliable comparisons with competing approaches.
At the IDB, we have found that the key is to test pilot projects and assess the data that are generated. Governments and other organizations, including development institutions like the IDB, can then work together to scale the programs that prove most effective, while applying the lessons of less effective interventions.
Much like scoring a goal, hitting a home run, or dunking a basketball, making sports-for-development programs work requires a lot of practice, not just to master the technique or approach, but also to be able to apply it to diverse circumstances.
What happens on the playing field depends on everything that happened before — the failures, as well as the successes.
If governments are not willing to put in the work, their investments will not be worthwhile.
However, if they commit to the experimentation, evidence collection and evaluation that all smart public spending requires, sports-based investment can go a long way toward strengthening communities and enabling young people to live healthier, happier and more productive lives.
Luis Alberto Moreno is president of the Inter-American Development Bank and a member of the World Economic Forum’s Foundation board.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry