Amendments to the Air Pollution Control Act (空氣污染防制法), which passed a third reading on Monday, were criticized by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) as a political move ahead of the nine-in-one elections.
KMT criticism of bills put forward by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) on issues on which the two parties have different platforms is to be expected — such as with the military pension reform bill passed on June 20.
However, opposition to an environmental protection bill is arguably protest for protest’s sake and demonstrates a fundamental inability of the nation’s two main parties to engage in bipartisanship.
Partisan politics are not uncommon in democracies with two major parties, and partisanship has historically defined the relationship between the UK’s Conservative Party and the Labour Party, and the US’ Democrats and Republicans. However, in the US there are also historical examples of the Democrats and Republicans cooperating, and both have at times held similar platforms on key issues.
An article on Web site The Atlantic on Aug. 27 last year argued that bipartisanship happens in the US when there is factionalism within one party, or when there are partisan incentives for cooperation with the opposition. The article cites the example of former US president Harry Truman, a Democrat who worked with the Republicans, many of whom at the time “did not want to be seen by voters as the way of liberal internationalism in the aftermath of World War II and the expansion of Soviet communism.”
Republicans also cooperated with former US president Lyndon Johnson in 1964 and 1965 to improve their standing in southern US states at a time when Democrat supporters there formed the majority opinion on civil rights issues, the article said.
By comparison, the KMT acts in blatant opposition to the will of the majority, criticizing President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) refusal to accept China’s “one China” principle and applying for a China travel permit for KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) to meet with the Chinese Communist Party, at a time when Taiwanese see China as an antagonistic bully.
The KMT also regularly refuses to cooperate with the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee when the public sees transitional justice efforts as a crucial part of advancing the nation’s democratization efforts.
Perhaps the two parties are fundamentally incompatible because the DPP and the KMT have different visions for the nation’s future and definitions of its sovereignty.
The DPP rose to power largely on its platform of seeking Taiwanese independence, and Premier William Lai (賴清德) on April 3 reiterated that position by calling himself a “Taiwan independence worker.”
The drop in the DPP’s popularity since Tsai took office might be partially rooted in Tsai’s failure to take more aggressive steps in that direction. However, as Brian Hioe wrote in an article for Web site New Bloom, the position within the DPP “would seem to be that pushing for Taiwanese independence is too dangerous and possibly disruptive of cross-strait relations.”
Tsai has expressed a desire to cooperate with China, but on Monday reiterated that the nation would not make concessions on its sovereignty and its democracy, saying: “In the face of China’s threats we feel the need for us to improve self-defense capabilities.”
Likely it is not the hope of many in the KMT for Taiwan to become a territory ruled by Beijing, and the KMT and the DPP seem to be buying time, but the approach of both parties is different. While the KMT seems to believe that talking nicely to China is the best way to keep it at bay, the DPP seems to be taking the approach of warning China while cozying up to the US and other parties friendly to Taiwan.
Given China’s relentlessness, the best option for both parties would be to find a way to cooperate in the nation’s interest.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry