People who would be adversely affected by pension reforms when they take effect next month have been saying that as soon as monthly pension payments to retired military personnel, public servants and state school teachers are cut, it would naturally cause those groups to spend less.
They warn that reduced consumption by pensioners would eventually hit all kinds of businesses, starting with the service sector, and that it would drag on economic growth.
These people say that pension reforms will end up hurting everyone, but are their arguments reasonable from the perspective of the nation’s economic sustainability?
Strictly speaking, the pension reforms will only cause temporary pain. They are based on a sense of responsibility for the nation’s future. It is just like getting back to normal daily life the day after a happy party.
Greece’s troubles have made clear why Taiwan needs to implement pension reforms. That must involve not only reducing monthly pension payments for retirees, but also raising annuity premium rates for those still working.
If these steps are not taken, Taiwan could eventually experience a financial crisis that threatens the nation’s very existence.
On the surface, Taiwan has huge foreign currency reserves, but that also means putting more New Taiwan dollars into circulation.
If Taiwan were to run into liquidity problems or default on its debts, it is unlikely that it would get support from the IMF, as South Korea did in 1997, when it was battered by the Asian financial crisis.
Besides, such a bailout would involve surrendering the nation’s financial autonomy and obeying the IMF’s orders, and the required belt-tightening would make life even grimmer.
Indeed, considering Taiwan’s national situation and China’s desire to annex it, Taiwanese might find themselves isolated, with no one willing to help.
That is why the government has no option but to undertake some things that will upset public opinion. Even if it fears losing votes, it must implement comprehensive pension reforms, because national governance, especially with regard to fiscal security and stability, requires accepting responsibility for the future.
It also calls for viewing and judging today’s issues from a historical perspective.
Some of those who will be hit by the coming wave of pension reforms, as well as some media outlets, are threatening working people by saying that the pension reforms will make retirees worse off.
People had better watch out, because this group would be spending less on goods and services, the argument goes.
They also warn the government to watch its steps. If other people, faced with such short-sighted, selfish and malicious attitudes, react irrationally and start behaving in a similar manner, they will only be letting selfish and greedy people lead them by the nose.
Domestic consumption does not rely exclusively on former government employees spending their pensions. It also depends on increasing productivity and upgrading technology. Salary earners are also consumers.
With the government leading the way, businesses should see their employees as a force for growth. They should keep raising salaries so that domestic consumption can keep growing each year, boosting tax revenues and generate more job opportunities.
Those who say that pension reforms would sink the ship and everyone is going down with them should really change their attitude to one of “the whole country is my family.”
Chang Hsun-ching is a writer.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under