Since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office, an epidemic seems to have spread across the nation, as calls to save the government’s support rating can be heard time and again.
While Tsai has been busy pushing her reform agenda, her support and approval ratings have dropped, as the number of people dissatisfied with her performance has risen.
Different solutions have been proposed, but the most common is the call for a change of premiers.
As soon as a new premier takes office, the government’s support rating climbs in the next few polls, but the numbers start to drop again after the honeymoon period ends: Not even widely hailed “relief pitcher” Premier William Lai (賴清德) has been an exception, as his ratings have also slid.
The main reason the Tsai administration has not received public praise for its reforms and instead stirred discontent, led by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), over a stagnating economy and diplomatic setbacks is due to deteriorating relations with China.
If this is the case, the only way to save Tsai’s support rating might be to appoint Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation chairman You Ying-lung (游盈隆) as premier.
Doing that would serve two purposes: On one hand, it would put an end to his manipulation of opinion polls, and on the other hand, it would show how competent he really is.
Opinion polls originated in the US, and so American culture is part of their background: Those who conduct such polls and those who participate in them are basically honest and impartial, and polls are not the results of pseudo-scientific manipulation.
There will always be a margin of error and opinion polls must not be treated as fact. If they were, the US would not have to conduct any primary elections.
Taiwan is imitating the US model, but it has been unable to imitate the culture of integrity and impartiality. The people conducting opinion polls in Taiwan have learned the theory and methodology, but their attitudes are not completely honest and impartial. They use imprecise language in their questions, hype the results as if they were breaking news and make fun of them with inappropriate jokes.
It is unfair to say that Taiwanese are not honest or impartial, but they do not place much importance in thinking. They like to parrot what others say, are reluctant to give due praise, and are good at finding faults and hissing at others.
Moreover, there is a discrepancy in the recognition of national identity that is rarely seen anywhere else, and this provides a good opportunity for the KMT to spread its sophistry and fallacies, and mislead the public.
I have read US newspapers for dozens of years, and apart from public polls conducted prior to presidential elections, I have never seen them treat the approval rating of their president as headline news or make it a subject to be commented upon.
The Gallup Poll, the survey company with the longest history, just changed its daily tracking of the president’s approval rating to weekly, but it only publishes the results as a matter of public record and never calls a news conference to present them.
Despite the lack of a culture of honesty and integrity and poll conductors intentionally manipulating surveys and taking pride in treating garbage as gold, these opinion polls continue to be treated as something important.
In this situation, it is meaningless to spend your days calling for saving the government’s support rating.
James Wang is a senior media commentator.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry