US talk show host Stephen Colbert on May 7 satirized China’s social credit rating system on CBS’ The Late Show, saying, among other things, that what China really needs to “purify” is not its society, but its air.
The show has drawn attention to China’s social credit system, which brings together credit records, digital surveillance and big data to give people dynamic ratings for everything they do.
The Chinese government said the system can “purify society,” and establish stronger awareness about credit and trustworthiness, which would be a new development in Chinese society.
The system is scheduled to be fully implemented in 2020, and when that happens, every Chinese individual and company, and even every government department, would be subject to credit ratings.
It would also involve “incentives for promise-keeping” and “punishments for trust-breaking” that are meant to achieve a situation where “if trust is broken in one place, restrictions are imposed everywhere,” as called for by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
The items rated under the system include all kinds of activities, including records about matters ranging from infringing traffic regulations or offending public morality to spending too much time playing computer games or criticizing the government.
Following test runs of the system last month, about 10 million Chinese have already been blacklisted as “trust-breakers.” This results in them being subjected to various degrees of punishment and restrictions with regard to such things as employment, accommodation, loans, freedom of movement, extravagant consumption, social security and political rights.
Penalties could also be extended to the next generation by preventing blacklisted people’s children from going to school and finding employment.
Anyone living in a true democracy, such as Taiwan, can see how these systematic limitations violate basic human rights.
The system could be further adjusted to produce ratings about “patriotism” and quantify Chinese’s political leanings. That would encourage people to report on one another, thus creating living conditions in which people cannot trust one another.
An important point to consider is that Chinese surveillance technology has long since penetrated Taiwan. Many Chinese consumer electronics brands, such as mobile phones and apps, have gained a certain market share in Taiwan. The problem is that many of these products have been identified by information security testing agencies in various nations as posing threats to information security.
In the past few years, even companies such as Facebook and Google have conceded to Chinese government demands to allow the examination of their content. This combination of big-country government and tech giants generates a web of surveillance technology far beyond anything George Orwell imagined in his novel Nineteen Eighty-Four.
However, the Taiwanese government is not sufficiently alert to this problem. Aside from a number of agencies, such as the Ministry of National Defense and the National Security Bureau, which restrict the use of Chinese information and communications products, private organizations and the general public hardly take any precautions.
The government should actively intervene and manage this problem at the source and it should inform the public about the risk of Chinese digital technology invading Taiwan.
Taiwanese need to heighten their vigilance and bolster the nation’s defensive capabilities with regard to information and national security.
Chen Kuan-fu is a graduate student in National Taipei University’s Department of Law.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry