Edward Leung (梁天琦), one of the leaders of the Hong Kong localist movement, was on Monday jailed for six years after being convicted of rioting. Another riot charge against him is still under review.
This is a political verdict using “rioting” as an excuse; the Chinese Communist Party is using the judiciary to suppress the Hong Kong localist movement.
In the same way that the authoritarian government in Taiwan used Article 100 of the Criminal Code, Beijing has been using rioting as an excuse to stage political trials against young Hong Kong localists who participated in the Mong Kok unrest, also known as the “fishball revolution.”
A total of 91 people between 14 and 70 years of age were arrested in connection with the events and at least 28 have been convicted — the harshest sentence being seven years in prison.
The series of political trials reflects China’s awareness of the increasingly vocal Hong Kong independence and anti-China protests, and explain why it is deploying the police and military to suppress protesters and then using legal sanctions to repress them.
This overbearing strategy that covers up its weaknesses is the same approach used during the Kaohsiung Incident trials in Taiwan in the 1970s.
Claiming to be “the authentic China,” the despotic colonial regime was facing a burgeoning domestic democratic movement, while losing recognition from the international community. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hoped to use political trials to suppress pro-democracy voices and divert focus from the domestic and international challenges to its rule.
Beijing has not been able to gain complete control over Hong Kong after its return to China. As the division between its rule and Hong Kong’s younger generations grows stronger, China is becoming further aggravated and has decided not to hide its colonial mentality.
Among its measures, the most ineffectual one has been blocking all channels and systemic cracks that can be used to propagate anti-Chinese and pro-Hong Kong independence messages.
Not allowing Leung to run in the 2016 legislative election because of his pro-independence stance and the disqualification of several members-elect of the Hong Kong Legislative Council due to the “flawed” oath-taking process are two notable instances.
The Chinese government is forcefully rejecting the notion of allowing the public express its views through elections.
Today, the symbolic result of the Chinese government’s “fishball revolution” political trials is to highlight China’s political infiltration of Hong Kong’s judicial autonomy and independence, once the territory’s pride.
Political trials are the Chinese government’s own unique take on “transitional justice.” They make it clear that the “one country, two systems” framework is really only about “one country.”
In Taiwan, many commentators parroting Beijing’s political views have incessantly condemned President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) refusal to acknowledge the so-called “1992 consensus” as the main cause of Taiwan’s problems.
In the name of freedom of expression, these pro-China commentators are endorsing an enemy state lacking either freedom or democracy. They are fellows of the Chinese communist regime, standing in opposition to a generation of young Taiwanese and every person who would defend the nation’s freedom and democratic system.
Yen Ming-wei is the spokesman of the Taiwan Radical Wings party and a senior in National Sun Yat-sen University’s sociology department.
Translated by Ho-ming Chang
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China