One of the main tasks facing the Legislative Yuan during the current extraordinary legislative session is amending the Air Pollution Control Act (空氣污染防制法). Improving the nation’s air quality is an urgent matter, but there have been concerns that draft amendments will not be as comprehensive as they should be.
A major point of contention is that the draft amendments proposed by the Executive Yuan do not remove a rule that regional total quantity controls require the consent of the Ministry of Economic Affairs. The act stipulates that the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) must announce and implement regulations related to total quantity control “in conjunction with” the ministry, but the proposed amendments do not change the wording to state that the agency should “confer with” the ministry.
This might be because the government is worried that protecting the environment will have a negative effect on economic growth, but is there really a conflict between environmental protection and economic growth? Could policy decisions made by the agency to reduce air pollution really cancel out the ministry’s efforts to develop the economy?
To answer these questions, some examples from around the world need to be examined.
In 1990, the US Environmental Protection Agency proposed amendments to the Clean Air Act to make it stricter. When these more stringent regulations were enacted, some industries that faced higher pollution prevention and control costs were so unhappy about it that they took the US government to court.
However, a research report published by the US agency said that improvements in air quality resulting from the stricter rules prevented the early deaths of 160,000 adults and 230 children in the US in 2010 alone — not including about 4,300 deaths resulting from ozone pollution.
The rules also reduced the incidence of many illnesses, thus lowering the number of workdays lost to sick leave and increasing productivity, it said.
The report estimated that the economic benefits resulting from the stricter environmental protection rules exceeded the costs by a factor of more than 30.
The WHO this year published a report along similar lines, which said that if the entire world followed the organization’s recommended “road map” for reducing air pollution, it could prevent 5.4 million deaths from this year to 2023 and generate annual net economic benefits of almost US$90 billion by 2023.
The WHO report estimated that the economic benefits would be 16 times greater than the costs involved.
A National Taiwan University College of Public Health study found that more than 6,000 people died in Taiwan in 2014 due to PM2.5 — airborne particles measuring 2.5 micrometers or less.
Based on these findings, if Taiwan could reduce air pollution, it could reduce the burden of pollution-related illnesses and the resulting loss of productivity, and create benefits that far outweigh the costs.
If the Air Pollution Control Act is amended to change the words “in conjunction with” to “confer with,” it would mean that the EPA is fully in charge. The aforementioned examples show that if the EPA is allowed to do its job of protecting the environment, the economy would also improve.
Besides, the EPA’s minister would still be appointed by the premier, so why would anyone worry that the agency could hamper the ministry’s efforts?
Chien Jien-wen is chairman of the Changhua Medical Alliance for Public Affairs.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry