Robert Indiana, the artist who made the LOVE sculpture outside Taipei 101, passed away on May 19.
When the project was under review 12 years ago, I had strong opinions about it — had I had the power to vote, I would have voted against it. Unfortunately, I was a member of a higher-level committee in the three-level, three-instance review system, so my job was only to make sure that the procedure was legal.
I was against it because it was too expensive — NT$30 million (US$1.01 million) — and too old-fashioned — it would have been popular 50 years ago.
For someone with too much money, buying it might be alright — it would mean that we would have the same thing that other countries do. The thing is that other countries purchased their works when Indiana was a hot ticket, making the work more topical.
Today, it can be seen in so many cities around the world that people have become numb to it. Probably the only exception is Paris — because you cannot find this work outdoors in Paris. Parisians just do not believe in this kind of thing.
US artist Jeff Koons not long ago proposed to gift his sculpture Bouquet of Tulips to Paris. Although Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo has agreed to accept it, some insightful people are opposed to the plan.
The original purpose of gifting the work was as a memorial for the victims of the 2015 terrorist attack in Paris, but the site proposed by Koons is not close to the place of the attack. Instead, it is near the Palais de Tokyo, a tourist attraction.
There are also fears that this four-floor-tall piece might block the view of other buildings — and the Eiffel Tower is just across the river. The mayor therefore proposed two alternative locations, but the artist rejected them. This makes people suspicious of Koons’ motives, thinking that perhaps he just wants to use Paris to his own advantage.
The proposed plan is that the artist will only provide the design blueprint and the subsequent expenditure of 3.5 million euros (US$4.124 million) is to be paid by the city’s residents.
Human life is short, but the life of art is long: Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa is very old, but it is still a masterpiece.
However, the LOVE sculpture is a different case. Indiana originally designed it for New York’s Museum of Modern Art as a Christmas card in 1964 and then used the image to design stamps.
It became a huge success because it was during the Vietnam War, when people were particularly receptive to love and peace. The artist then further developed it into a sculpture, which was just as successful, although the artist changed colors and letters — even Spanish and Hebrew versions were available.
This attracted a lot of criticism, with critics saying that Indiana was shameless and his work was excessively copied and transformed, with the result that the artist became a recluse.
The piece is design-oriented, and you feel neither the quality and texture of modern art nor the rebellious spirit of contemporary art. An advertising company might be able to make the same thing and at a lower cost.
However, people often believe in masters — they can be late bloomers, but others turn sour in their older age. Picasso, for example, was described as a paper tiger in his later years, because his works then were mostly variations of famous paintings from art history and were no longer original.
However, if the judges are not careful enough, they might still buy into the “master myth.” At Kaohsiung’s Zuoying Station, there is a piece of art made of junk, which cost about NT$15 million.
The materials are all old lights and fences from the Taiwan Railways Administration’s warehouses and it was only because the artist was famous French artist Arman that this piece was treated differently.
I happened to be a judge at this bid project and I voted against his work. However, the majority decides, and so this work was selected.
One of the reasons I objected was that the artist was still alive at the time of the bidding process, but passed away after winning the bid, so the work had to be completed by his assistants. Fearing for the quality, I voted against it.
Masters, masters, what waste is committed in your name?
Lu Ching-fu is a professor in Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Applied Arts.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under