The situation across the Taiwan Strait has become unstable and everyone knows who is to blame, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) said on Wednesday to the only audience likely to listen to him, much less agree: KMT members and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials and flunkies.
Hau named no names in his speech to the 10th Straits Forum in Xiamen, China, but he did not have to with that audience. They would all know to whom he was referring, just as they would all be equally incapable of acknowledging that the situation could be due to their own parties’ actions.
Hau mentioned the 23 cross-strait accords that were signed during then-president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) KMT administration, calling them “solemn promises made by both sides of the Taiwan Strait to their people ... and indispensable preconditions for Beijing’s ‘31 incentives’ designed to promote cross-strait economic and cultural exchanges.”
Missing from his myopic paean to a cross-strait family was any recognition that it was Ma and the KMT’s attempt to ram the last of those 23 accords, the service trade agreement, through the legislature that triggered the Sunflower movement’s occupation of the Legislative Yuan in 2014 and ignited a groundswell of opposition that cost the KMT the Presidential Office and its legislative majority in 2016.
Also missing from Hau’s speech, or the one by Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Yang (汪洋) blaming the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for thwarting the development of a peaceful cross-strait relationship, was any recognition that it was actually the CCP’s actions, especially Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) efforts to eliminate China’s fledgling civil society and its continuing flaunting of its constitution, that have made a majority of Taiwanese averse to the parties’ unification dream.
Xi and the CCP are the bulls running amok, not the DPP or Taiwanese demanding a say in their own future, unwilling to embrace one that means giving up everything they have gained in the past two decades.
Hau also failed to add to his repeated mentions of the so-called “1992 consensus” that the KMT has always insisted that its purported agreement with the CCP included each side having its own interpretation of what the “China” in “one China” means, showing that he lacks the bravery to acknowledge that even within a family, there could be disagreements.
Of course, in Beijing’s view it is the DPP that has been running amok. It would be funny — if it were not so tragic and the potential repercussions so dire — how oblivious Chinese bureaucrats can be to their hypocrisy, as the Taiwan Affairs Office showed once again when it complained about President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) message on Monday on Facebook urging China to address the injustices of the Tiananmen Square Massacre.
After saying that the “leader of the Democratic Progressive Party authority” and the DPP “have no qualifications to make irresponsible remarks” about China’s development, it proclaimed that the DPP “harps on about the same old thing year in, year out...They are out of tricks.”
Just like Beijing and the KMT harp about the same fake consensus year in, year out?
The office’s posturing was more inane than normal, because it was responding to the message Tsai posted in simplified characters on a social media platform that Beijing bars the people in its own country from accessing.
However, the office also ignored a Facebook post by Ma, who wrote that unification cannot be discussed until the injustices of the Tiananmen Square Massacre are redressed, and asked why the CCP cannot face its own history as Taiwan has.
A very good question indeed.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry