Religious provocation
If it was Herbert Hanreich’s intention to be provocative with his opinion piece, then he clearly succeeded, judging from the high number of views and comments his article elicited (“Missionary positions in Taiwan,” May 30, page 8).
This must be gratifying to him, but that gratification feels to me more a matter of airing some pet peeves in public than of finding something significant to say about any of the three bees in Hanreich’s bonnet: religious proselytizing, the educational disaster visited upon the minds of young Taiwanese students and the unlovable nature of the Bible.
Those minds of young Taiwanese students, Hanreich tells us, are intellectual deserts of blind obedience and rote learning without understanding, mere neural storage spaces containing temporary knowledge shifted over and over again by the coming and going of exams.
Local culture makes them so because it is inimical to fostering critical and independent thinking.
How many times have I heard this said.
I have taught enough eager students with sparkling minds to know that it is simply not true.
In every class here, there are a couple of smart young minds among a majority of more humdrum ones, just as I found this to be the case in classrooms in the US and the Netherlands, where I have also taught.
Hanreich characterizes learning in Taiwan as a copy-paste-delete routine.
It is his idea about Taiwanese education that is a copy-paste job; too bad he cannot find the delete button, and look and think for himself.
Hanreich’s view of the Bible is another copy-paste job making one yearn for a delete button.
We have read it all in The New Atheists and it has all the merits of taking the Bible just as literally as religious fundamentalists do.
There are many Christians for whom the Bible is a very different book, a revelation of a sublime God we can never really know.
Proselytizers, yes, they tend not to be that sort of Christian and I have to end agreeing with Hanreich that they — or proselytizers of any other creed or conviction, religious or otherwise — should not have a place on campuses except in contexts in which their views are invited to be discussed, contested and challenged by the smart, intelligent students to be found on Taiwanese campuses.
Rudolphus Teeuwen
Kaohsiung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.