Beijing is slowly putting the squeeze on Australia for its acts of omission and commission in its relations with China.
Now that China acts as the superpower in the Indo-Pacific region, Australia is finding it very hard to balance, if it were ever possible, its relations between the US, its major security partner, and China, its biggest trading partner.
It is all the more difficult when the US regards China as its strategic competitor and Australia is on the US side, even though Canberra is still trying to figure out where the US is headed with US President Donald Trump at the helm, but that is a different story.
The fact remains that the US is not happy with China’s policy of claiming sovereignty over South China Sea island groups, and by extension, making the waters around them its own lake.
China has dredged up sand dunes and turned these and other islets into military facilities, lately stationing anti-ship and anti-air missiles and bombers. Some of these bombers might bring Australia’s northern region within their range.
Australia and the US are unhappy at the militarization of the South China islands, on top of China overriding competitive sovereignty claims of other regional countries. They contend that China is not following international law in these matters, which is leading to tensions in the region.
China lays claim to these and other islands on historical grounds that are difficult to substantiate. There is so much contested stuff in these waters to make them a flashing point — although the regional claimants seem to be adjusting, however unwillingly, to China’s growing economic and military power.
Australia has continued to uphold the primacy of its strategic alliance with the US, despite its increasingly primary economic relationship with China, hoping that it might strike some sort of a balance between the two, which is proving increasingly difficult to sustain.
There has also been a lot of reporting in the media lately suggesting that China’s and/or the Chinese Communist Party’s aligned interests here might be seeking to subvert Australian institutions through political donations, pouring money into universities, buying into strategic infrastructure and the like.
A Chinese-Australian billionaire, who has been doling out money to political parties and university centers, was named in the Australian parliament, under parliamentary privilege, as a coconspirator in a bribery scandal at the UN.
There have been reports of some rich Chinese-Australians mobilizing people of Chinese heritage in Australia and other sympathetic political and cultural groups.
An Labor Party senator had to resign when it was found out that an Australian-Chinese billionaire was funding some of his expenses and for espousing China’s position on its sovereignty over South China Sea islands, at variance with his party’s and the government’s critical position.
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Director-General Duncan Lewis has reportedly said that Australia is facing a greater threat from espionage today — without naming China — than at any time since the Cold War.
To deal with it, the government is considering passing legislation to curb or outlaw such activities that are designed to take advantage of Australia’s free and democratic system.
China is unhappy, indeed angry, with the way that Canberra, it believes, is focusing on its role. So much so that it put a virtual freeze on Australian ministerial visits to China. The one recent trip by an Australian minister was to watch a China-Australia sporting event.
Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs Julie Bishop was only able to have a conversation with Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) on the sidelines of a G20 meeting in Argentina. The TV images of it only seemed to highlight their frayed relationship
At another level, Beijing is putting the squeeze on some of Australia’s exports, such as wines. It seems intended to warn Australia that, if it does not mend its ways, there might be more of the same to come.
A hint of it was reportedly in an editorial in China’s Global Times, which said that it was “necessary for China to leave Australia hanging for a while,” even suggesting cutting Australian exports of up to US$10 billion that would “send cold chills up and down the spine of Australia.”
It remains to be seen how Australia will deal with its China problem, considering that there is a basic contradiction between its primary economic relationship with China and its strategic alliance with the US.
Sushil Seth is a commentator based in Australia.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry