In an article published earlier this year, June Teufel Dreyer, a senior fellow at the US-based Foreign Policy Research Institute, said that Wang Huning (王滬寧), a member of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) politburo, in 2005 proposed establishing a social democratic party in Taiwan.
This party was to have ties with the CCP, and become the ruling party in Taiwan to use Taiwanese democracy against itself.
Taiwan’s legal system is not yet up to the task of safeguarding the nation’s interests against China’s “united front” and infiltration tactics or pro-China groups and individuals within Taiwan.
The Chinese flag is allowed to fly freely in Taiwan, thanks to the freedom of expression laws here. Police have their hands tied on this, not to mention when dealing with pro-China organizations that would sell Taiwan out.
The enactment of anti-“united front” and anti-infiltration legislation is of utmost importance.
Ever since the Cold War, the US has had stringent national security legislation in place.
Anyone traveling to a potentially hostile country, such as Russia, be they government officials, members of the US Congress or private citizens, and regardless of the purpose of their trip, would on their return be debriefed. They would have to give a detailed account of the nature of their activities and the background of the people they came into contact with during their stay — especially if they are regarded as anti-US activists. If they lie they could face punishment.
The German criminal code stipulates that anyone who domestically distributes or publicly uses, produces, stocks, imports or exports, in public or in an assembly, symbols of organizations — including flags, insignia, uniforms and their parts, slogans and forms of greeting — deemed by the German Federal Constitutional Court as illegal is liable to imprisonment not exceeding three years, or a fine.
Anyone approving of national socialist (Nazi) actions, or denying Nazi crimes, can be sentenced to three months to five years in prison for incitement.
Suspicions have been raised over a former premier of an Australian state and his shady ties with the Chinese communists. He is said to have been working in China’s interest. It was revealed that he asked an Australian senator to question the government about the credentials of an official writing a confidential report on China’s attempts to interfere with and influence Australian politics. He now faces legal action and calls for expulsion from his party.
A report published in 2016 in Australia said that Chinese interference in Australian politics has been going on for a decade, obliging Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull to back legislation to counter espionage and foreign interference.
Even powerful nations, such as the US, Germany and Australia, need comprehensive and robust legislation to safeguard their national security. Taiwan is constantly under Chinese threat and must protect itself against Beijing’s “united front” tactics and infiltration attempts: How much more so does Taiwan need robust legislation to counter that threat?
The National Security Act (國家安全法) and Criminal Code do not grant the government enough power to counter the actions of Beijing and its affiliate organizations in Taiwan.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) should make it known that her government will have zero tolerance for such infiltration by introducing more comprehensive legislation to counter the threat.
If it does not, China’s influence in Taiwan will spread and the nation’s very future will be in jeopardy.
Lau Yi-te is chairman of the Taiwan Solidarity Union.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry