Since the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) came into effect, many countries have initiated and implemented various activities in response. Taiwan is no exception and has always been committed to the exploration of SDGs toward building a sustainable Taiwan.
Looking at major national policies in our nation, such as the Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program and the “five plus two” industrial transformation plan, it is easy to see that they have many aspects consistent with the SDGs.
As an academic who is currently a member of the Executive Yuan’s National Council for Sustainable Development, I would like to point out a special Taiwan Sustainable Development Goal — No. 18 — a nuclear-free homeland, which is not only a link in the energy transition for our nation, but a major policy approach for sustainable development.
It has many connections with the UN’s SDGs, as its vision could refer to No. 7, affordable and clean energy; No. 9, industry, innovation and infrastructure; No. 13, climate action; No. 12, responsible consumption and production; and No. 17, partnerships for the goals.
Given the decision of the Supreme Administrative Court on May 23, it is necessary to again review the nuclear waste disposal mode. Given the advancements in material science, the draft of disposal methods for nuclear waste with high and low-level radioactivity could draw on the EU’s related regulations and experience.
Regarding low-level nuclear waste, the UK’s National Nuclear Laboratory has more than 25 years of experience for encapsulation and therefore is able to rapidly differentiate the optimum cement immobilization strategy for corresponding nuclear materials through a cement toolbox.
The disposal mode of this low-level waste could facilitate the promotion and implementation of the decommissioning of the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門) and the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in Wanli District (萬里).
With respect to high-level nuclear waste, France’s 1991 Waste Management Act, which was updated in 2006, declares deep geological disposal as a reference solution for high-level and long-lived radioactive wastes, as well as setting 2025 as a target to open its first repository site.
Under such circumstances, communications among stakeholders, including government, industries and residents is a critical issue for the site selection process. Therefore a new communication mechanism is initiated to assure residents, as well as forming a more comprehensive and integrated thinking and systematic strategies.
Following the above, the new communication model could be developed by referring to the experience of European countries to respond to the site selection issues. Basically, the EU’s Implementing Public Participation Approaches in Radioactive Waste Disposal suggests that the awareness of nuclear relevant knowledge is the fundamental thing for public participation.
On this basis, France regards transparency in knowledge propagation as a vital element while trying to incorporate its citizens and the elected representatives into the decision-making process. Germany attempts to facilitate the public participation through diversified channels, including public councils, public dialogue, information centers at possible sites, as well as possibilities of more channels to ensure participation and transparency of the site selection process for radioactive waste disposal.
Given that we live in a rapidly developing digital age, the site selection process in our nation could be equipped with smart tools such as a Web-based toolbox to allow for more convenient and intuitive active public communication, which would endow the site selection process with responsibility, transparency and democracy.
Last, but not least, implementation of the UN’s SDG17 is another essential factor to promote a nuclear-free homeland. Since Germany has decided to phase out nuclear energy by 2020 and replace it with renewables, interactions with Germany could be initiated to explore the development of a nuclear-free homeland through communications.
Alternatively, as France, a giant in nuclear electricity, has been heavily relying on nuclear energy, it is seeking international companions to help it decommission old nuclear reactors and dispose of nuclear waste.
Looking at Taiwan, the decommissioning of nuclear reactors and safe disposal of nuclear waste could be achieved through intensive international collaboration. We should look at what Taiwan’s highlights are and what challenges it faces, what its strengths and weaknesses are.
We should examine how Taiwan could deliver a “What Taiwan Can Offer” through its strengths, and demonstrate “What Taiwan Can Learn From” through its weaknesses or challenges, as well as propose opportunities for bilateral partnership, to achieve a sustainable future.
Chen Chih-wei is a member of the Executive Yuan’s National Council for Sustainable Development.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.