From tech giant Facebook to libraries and schools, organizations are now subject to the world’s most far-reaching data privacy regulation in a crackdown aimed at protecting people from losing control over their personal information.
It has occupied thousands of lawyers, taken years of planning and triggered billions of e-mails.
Mess up now and you can expect very little tolerance, said European Data Protection Board chair Andrea Jelinek, the Austrian in charge of policing the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which took effect on Friday.
“If there are reasons to warn we will warn; if there are reasons to reprimand we will do that; and if we have reasons to fine, we are going to fine,” Jelinek, 57, told reporters ahead of the big day.
Asked about criticism that some regulators are more lenient than others, she said that “it was like that in the past, but it should not continue in the future.”
Privacy has moved from a niche topic to one of the biggest headaches for top bosses such as Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, who last week was grilled by EU lawmakers about how the data of about 87 million users and their friends may have been shared with a consulting firm with links to then-US presidential candidate Donald Trump’s US presidential campaign.
The pressure has been increasing on firms using or processing EU personal data in the run-up to the deadline. Privacy regulators across Europe for the first time get equal rights and responsibilities, and the same powers to mete out fines of as much as 4 percent of worldwide annual sales for serious violations.
Not everyone is willing to wait for Jelinek and regulators to flex their new powers.
Austrian lawyer Max Schrems, who has taken on Facebook many times and won a landmark EU court ruling in 2015, filed four complaints on Friday under the new rules, accusing Google, Facebook and also WhatsApp and Instagram of forcing users to agree to new privacy policies.
“Facebook has even blocked accounts of users who have not given consent,” Schrems said in an e-mailed statement. “In the end, users only had the choice to delete the account or hit the ‘agree’ button — that’s not a free choice, it more reminds of a North Korean election process.”
The 30-year-old’s group called “noyb” — for none of your business — filed what are likely the first GDPR complaints with national regulators in Belgium, France, Austria and Germany.
“We have prepared for the past 18 months to ensure we meet the requirements of the GDPR,” Facebook’s chief privacy officer Erin Egan said in an e-mailed statement. “We have made our policies clearer, our privacy settings easier to find and introduced better tools for people to access, download, and delete their information.”
Facebook’s “work to improve people’s privacy doesn’t stop on May 25,” Egan said.
EU nations will have to apply the same rules across the bloc, and give their data regulators complete independence.
“We don’t like to see any deviations which will go beyond the rules and spirit” of the rules, EU Justice Commissioner Vera Jourova said earlier in the month.
Facebook would dodge the tough new sanctions under the updated EU rules if any violations in the Cambridge Analytica case are proven because the rules do not apply retroactively.
Still, if companies “don’t stop on Friday, we can get them,” said Jelinek who leads Austria’s data privacy agency as well as board of regulators drawn from across the EU’s 28 nations.
She said she was expecting a big pile of complaints to be filed from day one of the new rules.
Regulators would “try to do our best” to deal with all complaints, she said.
She expects it would not be even two months until the first probes will be opened, but there would not be any fines right away.
Officials would not just be “popping in” to companies to slap a fine on them, she said.
“We are talking to the businesses, we have legal procedures to fulfill, we have to give them the opportunity to talk with us too,” she said.
It will be the start of a new era for everyone: “We are at the beginning of a journey, which we’re going to make together through the field of data protection,” she added.
The last few years have seen a “paradigm shift in awareness of data protection issues,” said Andrew Dyson, a lawyer at DLA Piper in London.
“You can’t open a newspaper without reading about the latest data breach, social media scandal or unethical marketing campaign. There is regulation, but it’s from a different era and increasingly looking toothless and out of date. The GDPR will reset the balance,” he said.
Companies “that get this right will establish high ethical standards, enhanced levels of consumer trust and be able to unlock the value of data,” he said. “Those who get it wrong face wrath of regulators, disgruntled customers and big constraints on digital innovation.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with