Vice Premier Shih Jun-ji (施俊吉) on May 14 said that the short-term solution to the problem of low wages is to increase hourly wages, so the Cabinet is planning to raise the minimum statutory hourly wage.
Minister of Labor Hsu Ming-chun (許銘春) chimed in, saying that there is a consensus in the government to raise the basic wage, and that the Basic Wage Deliberation Committee would convene to come up with suggestions as soon as possible.
The Cabinet also announced that the monthly minimum salary of government employees would be raised to NT$30,000.
With regard to medium-term measures, Premier William Lai (賴清德) has said that the main goal is to increase investment and speed up industrial upgrades.
He thinks the main economic problem is a lack of investment, which is why the government proposed the Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program and the “five plus two” industrial innovation plan.
If the government and the private sector work together to build more investment opportunities, more jobs would be created, offering a possible solution to the issue of low wages.
The government is trying to relieve the symptoms by raising the basic hourly wage and the basic wage for government employees, hoping that private businesses follow its lead.
Addressing fundamental problems and raising wages requires overall national economic structural reform and improvement.
The government must be cautious when relieving short-term symptoms by forcing an increase in the basic hourly wage. When South Korean President Moon Jae-in assumed office last year, he announced that the minimum hourly wage would be increased to 10,000 won (US$9.28) during his five-year presidency.
This year, Moon’s administration raised the basic hourly wage from 6,470 won to 7,530 won, an increase of 16.4 percent. However, last year, the number of long-term unemployed, or those unable to find a job for six months, reached 147,000, which was 14.3 percent of the total unemployed population and the highest figure since 2000.
More than 40 percent of South Korean enterprises — mainly labor-intensive small and medium-sized enterprises — are estimated to lay off employees in preparation for the upcoming salary increase.
Taiwan has far more small and medium-sized enterprises than South Korea. Moreover, there is no clear motive for private businesses to follow suit.
As for the medium-term approach to addressing fundamental problems, the government seems to have found the root of the low wage problem, and it should devote more resources to resolving it.
Of the three main drivers of national economic growth in recent years, investment has been the least stable. The nation’s fixed-asset investments even contracted last year.
The reason that businesses are less inclined to invest in Taiwan might be the same as their reason for sharing profits with shareholders rather than increasing employee wages: They do not see any future prospects for sustainable operations and profit creation, so are unwilling to invest and want to reap profits quickly to keep shareholders happy.
What the government should do is to change the short-term mindset of businesses and focus on reviving investment, which would contribute to growth. A strengthening of investment incentives would be followed by a growing need for personnel.
The government should work on increasing labor demand among enterprises so that it exceeds labor supply. This would drive up the cost of labor and provide a fundamental solution to the problem of low wages.
Darson Chiu is a research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations