China is home to 241 million people over the age of 60, approximately 17 percent of the population. By 2050, the elderly are to number about 500 million and account for more than one-third of the population.
The Chinese government has grown so alarmed by these developments that it is preparing to scrap all limits on the number of children that a family can have, a report by Bloomberg News said on Monday.
By early next year, the infamous one-child and — more recently — two-child policies should be no more.
That decision is worth celebrating as a victory for reproductive rights. However, on its own it is unlikely to inspire a baby boom. To encourage Chinese to have more children, the government is going to have to overcome some deeply ingrained biases and make it easier — not harder — for women to work while raising children.
China’s population has been aging since at least 1965, when the country’s modern fertility rate peaked.
Several factors contributed to the subsequent decline, including the Cultural Revolution and — starting in 1970 — coercive Maoist campaigns to promote later marriages, greater spacing between births and fewer children. By one accounting, as much as three-quarters of China’s fertility decline since 1970 took place even before the government introduced the one-child policy late in that decade.
Indeed, despite being often brutally enforced, the policy’s effect on China’s fertility rate, population and gender balance appears to have been limited. During the 1980s, the most intense period of enforcement, China’s fertility rate hardly changed at all.
When the rate began to decline again in the 1990s, finally falling below replacement value, economic changes appear to have been the cause.
Young Chinese, especially women, suddenly had greater access to education and jobs. To escape the burdens of small-town China, where they were expected to stay in the home and raise families, millions of women migrated to cities and took up factory work. Others took advantage of an expanding education system.
Today, 52 percent of Chinese women enroll in tertiary education, while fewer than 40 percent of men do the same. Career independence is a common goal, with 63.3 percent of women participating in the workforce.
These women face discrimination, even from the government, for choosing work over children.
Since 2007, the government has promoted the term “leftover women” to scapegoat successful, educated, unmarried, urban women over the age of 27.
The official attitudes trickle down to workplaces, where one comprehensive survey last year showed that 43 percent of women with graduate degrees experienced employment discrimination compared with 22 percent overall.
Likewise, married women without children and women in their prime child-bearing years were much more likely to face discrimination than their peers.
Pushing women to leave the workforce to have children is unlikely to help matters. At a time when the cost of raising children in China is becoming ever more expensive — and a leading factor cited by families that choose not to have more than one child — women need equal access to the job market and equal pay.
The first step should be to ensure both by actively enforcing laws against discrimination. That is part of a successful approach that Sweden adopted as early as the 1930s to boost a declining fertility rate, and there is no reason — beyond political will — that it could not be successful in China, too.
Officials also need to rethink well-meaning policies that are designed to help working women.
For example, last year the government expanded parental leave policies in 30 provinces. Yet, rather than being embraced by the public, the decision was widely dismissed and derided as yet another excuse for employers to avoid hiring and promoting women of child-bearing age.
Instead of lengthening leave time, it should be shortened and be made more generous, allowing people to receive a full salary while away from work.
It should then be supplemented with the introduction of a universal childcare program. While an expensive and long-term proposition, it is not as far-fetched an idea as it might seem. After all, China is keen to expand its service economy and childcare is an excellent way to boost skilled and semi-skilled employment.
If employment shortages emerge, migrants from Southeast Asia could fill the gap: China recently concluded an agreement to hire 100,000 Filipino English teachers.
A program could be rolled out in stages from expensive cities to the rural countryside, where demand is lower due to the presence of extended families and grandparents.
There is no question that China’s low fertility rate is a long-term burden, but it is also a reminder of the extraordinary economic and social progress the country has made over four decades.
As China looks to increase its population, it should do so by embracing those changes, not seeking to reverse them.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.