In January 1894, gold prospectors were digging in the Shigir peat bog, north of the town of Yekaterinburg in the Ural Mountains, when they uncovered a strange collection of carved pieces of wood.
A total of 10 fragments were found beside each other. When put together, a wooden idol more than 5m high was created, one that had clearly been carved from a single, carefully smoothed plank of larch wood. Its surface was covered with zigzag lines and human faces and hands.
This is the Shigir Idol, and according to scientists published in the archeology journal Antiquity, recent studies of its structure and date of construction dramatically overturn our ideas about the appearance of art among humans. It turns out that the idol is one of the oldest pieces of monumental art ever uncovered.
“Our analysis indicates that the Shigir Idol is about 11,500 years old,” said archeologist Thomas Terberger, a professor at Gottingen University in Germany, one of the authors of the Antiquity paper.
“At that time, Europe and Asia were still emerging from the ice age,” Terberger said. “There were no farmers then. The only humans in this part of the world at this time were hunter-gatherers. Yet, they created the Shigir Idol. The discovery of its antiquity therefore changes, dramatically, our views about the birth of ritual art.”
Many examples of the early stone age are known: They include the cave paintings of France and Spain, created more than 30,000 years ago, and tiny objects, carved out of mammoth tusks, that depict animals or animal-human hybrids. Many of these are extremely delicate and extraordinarily well-crafted, but they are generally realistic in style.
The symbol-covered Shigir Idol represents a leap beyond this sort of naturalistic art.
When the idol was discovered, the date of its construction was a matter of conjecture and remained so for a century until, in the 1990s, scientists removed a portion and used radiocarbon detectors to date it.
It produced an age of about 9,800 years. Many academics rejected the result as implausible.
Hunter-gatherers did not have the ability to make such a huge work or have the complex symbolic imagination to decorate it in the way that the idol has been adorned, skeptics said.
As a result, a new, more sophisticated dating was sought and the result of that work is outlined in Antiquity. These show that far from being a younger object than was suspected by the sceptics, the idol turns out to be even older than was indicated by the first dating attempt.
“The result was quite a surprise, I admit,” Terberger said
BREAKING ASSUMPTIONS
In the past, large-scale, complex art was considered to be the handiwork of later, sedentary farmers who started to spread from the Middle East about 8,000 years ago and took over land previously used by hunter-gatherers. These agrarian societies achieved considerable sophistication and were eventually responsible, in Britain, for the construction of great Neolithic works such as Stonehenge and the Ness of Brodgar in Orkney.
By contrast, it was assumed that hunter-gatherers were not capable of the type of symbolic thinking, nor the organization, that underpinned the design of these great monuments.
However, the dating of the Shigir Idol suggests that this is not the case, and that the period just after the last ice age was not a cultural desert as some experts have argued.
The lack of remains of hunter-gatherer monumental art might simply be blamed on the fact that they used wood that has not survived — unlike the stone works of their agrarian successors. Only the freak conditions of the peat bog of Yekaterinburg permitted the idol’s survival.
“We have to accept that hunter-gatherers had complex rituals and were capable of very sophisticated expression of ideas and art,” Terberger said. “These things didn’t start with farmers. They began much earlier with hunter-gatherers.”
Analysis of wood from the idol has also revealed much about living conditions.
“If you study the rings, you can see trees were growing very slowly as it was still pretty cold then. Europe was still emerging from the last ice age. You can see that in the rings of the wood that make up the idol,” he said.
Over the years, archeologists have dug up many small tools also decorated with zigzag symbols in northern Europe, suggesting that society was much less fragmented than previously thought, and that there was considerable sharing of ideas.
“It is exciting to see these connections being established over huge distances,” Terberger said.
However, what was the purpose of a monument that would have loomed over any terrain in which it was erected?
“From our current perspective, it is very hard to work out what was going on in the minds of the creators of the Shigir Idol,” Terberger said. “However, I am struck by the similarity of the idol with the totem poles of Native Americans in the northwest Pacific region.”
Such poles often honor gods or ancestors and this could explain the purpose of the idol.
Other researchers suggest alternative theories. Mikhail Zhilin of the Russian Academy of Sciences — another of the paper’s authors — argues that the idol might depict forest sprites or demons, while Vang Petersen, of the National Museum of Denmark, suggests that the carvings were “keep out” warnings not to stray on sacred land.
“It’s intriguing,” Terberger said. “What is certain is that its makers were saying a lot more than just an announcement that ‘I can build a big pole.’”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.