The Fisheries Agency’s response to Thursday’s protest in front of the Presidential Office Building calling for an end to the abuse of migrant fishermen in the nation’s deep-sea fishing fleet was so waterlogged that it deserves to sink to the bottom of the deepest ocean trench.
An alliance of human rights groups urged President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to address the abuse, one of the long-term problems that contributed to the nation’s fisheries industry being yellow-carded by the European Commission more than two-and-a-half years ago for illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU).
“The decision to issue a yellow card to Taiwan is based on serious shortcomings in the fisheries legal framework, a system of sanctions that does not deter IUU fishing, and lack of effective monitoring, control and surveillance of the long-distance fleet,” the commission said on Oct. 1, 2015.
The government appeared to take the yellow card warning seriously, as it was the key impetus in the passage of the Act for Distant Water Fisheries (遠洋漁業條例) in July 2016, which took effect on Jan. 15 last year, as well as amendments to the Fisheries Act (漁業法) and the Act to Govern Investment in the Operation of Foreign Flag Fishing Vessels (投資經營非我國籍漁船管理條例).
Those legislative measures were accompanied by reassurances from various Fisheries Agency and Council of Agriculture officials, at regular intervals, that they would be enough to convince the commission to lift the yellow card.
While the Act for Distant Water Fisheries did give migrant workers new protections, such as insurance, healthcare, regulated working hours and rest periods, and stronger rules governing labor brokers, it still relies on the industry to follow the rules and, even worse, still allows for an offshore hiring system — and therefore ruinous broker fees.
There is still no effective oversight mechanism to hold non-compliant brokers and employers accountable, and foreign fishermen are still not covered by the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法).
Not surprisingly, the commission was unimpressed. After visits to Taiwan in October last year and in March, commission officials said they decided to keep Taiwan on the warning list, because implementation of the new law was ineffective and the Fisheries Agency’s management was not transparent enough.
The agency’s reaction to that news was to urge Taiwan’s distant water fishing fleet to ensure their boats observed foreign laws.
That was pretty watery, but it was nothing compared with its response to Thursday’s protest, which was to remind migrant fishermen that they could file complaints about abuses by their captains or boat owners by calling one of two phone numbers: one if they were in Taiwan, another if they were outside the country.
Even for a landlubber, it is hard to believe that making a cellphone call thousands of kilometers away when not only your job, but your life, depends upon your captain, will be of much help — not to mention the language barrier faced by Southeast Asian fishermen trying to communicate with land-based Taiwanese bureaucrats.
As with so many other social, economic and industrial issues facing Taiwan, passing or amending laws is one thing; ensuring that changes are implemented and monitoring for continued compliance is a whole other issue.
It is no good to set out monitoring requirements or list fines and other punishments, but not have either the personnel or the political will to carry out oversight — or relying on telephone calls from far out to sea to find out there is a problem.
Remember, the key phrase in the commission’s 2015 statement was “lack of effective monitoring, control and surveillance of the long-distance fleet.”
If the government really wants Taiwan’s yellow card lifted, it should end the offshore hiring system and give the responsibility for the employment and welfare of migrant fishermen to the Ministry of Labor.
Help is far more than a telephone call away when one is at sea.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and