While it is encouraging that the government is finally addressing a huge hole in harassment prevention — namely the lack of anti-stalking legislation — women’s rights groups last week brought up several valid points regarding how the draft act can be made more effective.
The Domestic Violence Prevention Act (家庭暴力防治法) and the Criminal Code treat stalking as an “incident” rather than repetitive and continuous behavior, punishable only by small fines. Restraining orders are only allowed when the victim has some kind of familial or romantic relationship with the stalker, denying that option to victims of anonymous stalkers.
In December last year, a male university student stabbed a female student he had been stalking for five years. Prior to this, groups had called for anti-stalking legislation for years, with the government never living up to its promises. Minister of the Interior Yeh Jiunn-rong (葉俊榮) in 2016 pledged at a Modern Women’s Foundation conference to come up with legislation, but nothing happened until the stabbing sparked outrage. Two weeks after the stabbing, then-deputy minister of the interior Hua Ching-chun (花敬群) promised that a draft act would be finalized in two months — and the government has finally delivered, with a bill that cleared the Executive Yuan last month.
The legislation seems to comprehensively define stalking as all actions toward a specific individual, whether out of “admiration, affection or resentment,” that “cause the focus of the attention to feel disgusted or fearful.” However, the women’s groups said that the terms are too abstract, and that victims often do not know why they are being stalked, especially in the case of a complete stranger.
Another problem the groups highlighted is that once a complaint is filed, police have three months to investigate — far too long to provide sufficient protection. Usually, by the time a victim is compelled to seek legal action, they have likely been dealing with the situation for a while and have exhausted their options. Society cannot afford another stabbing before this is again brought to attention.
Furthermore, a stalker might revert to more extreme behavior if they learn that their target has sought police assistance and should not be given that much time to come up with a more extreme or deadly plan. Additionally, a stalker would first receive only a warning and a fine, while a protection order can only be issued if they were found pestering their victim within two years. This puts a lot of pressure on the victim to repeatedly gather evidence and follow procedure while already facing a very stressful and traumatic situation. If a stalker has already exhibited such obsessive behavior, a warning and fine might not be sufficient to scare them off — and who knows what would happen if they grow desperate or are angered.
Finally, while legal protection is a good step, just creating legislation will not solve the problem — people must be educated that the incessant pursuit of an unrequited love often portrayed in movies is not a blueprint for romantic success, and must be shown the psychological damage it causes victims.
There should be more resources to explain to perpetrators and victims that such behavior is serious and should not be treated as a minor annoyance. For example, the stabbing victim’s family was aware of the behavior for five years, but did not realize the seriousness of the situation and even protected the perpetrator when he followed the victim into a police station by declining to press charges. Meanwhile, could the school have done something about it earlier, as they were both students?
Stalking must be taken more seriously, and as there is to be specific legislation against it — hopefully soon — this will push more people to recognize it as an actual crime and be less tolerant of such behavior.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under