Can human rights be decided by public referendum?
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on April 17 passed the initial review of three referendum proposals against same-sex marriage, including whether the right to same-sex marriage should be protected under the law, whether marriage should be defined as exclusively between a man and a woman, and whether the Ministry of Education should implement provisions concerning homosexuality education in the Enforcement Rules for Gender Equity Education Act (性別平等教育法施行細則) at elementary and junior-high school levels.
Surprisingly, these proposals, which obviously contravene the spirit of democracy, passed the commission’s review.
The issue of same-sex marriage, a basic human right, will now be subject to a referendum.
With the passage of the referendum proposals, Taiwanese society will have to start rebuilding its civil rights.
Such a regressive decision might not have come as a surprise under the authoritarian system during the Martial Law era, but now it has happened in a maturing democracy and under the rule of law. It leaves the confusing feeling that Taiwanese are suddenly out of phase with time.
That the CEC would pass such dark proposals is a direct slap in the face to President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Everyone remembers how Tsai more than once during her election campaign said: “My name is Tsai Ing-wen and I support marriage equality.”
That statement moved many people who believe in democracy. The president’s opinion was already approved by the public, so in a way, the presidential election was the most open and fair of referendums.
Why should there be another vote? Were Tsai’s pledges just a joke and did she simply deceive voters? Could it really be that the general public is less intelligent than the myopic Alliance of Taiwan Religious Groups for the Protection of the Family?
A presidential election ranks much higher than any referendum. Despite this, the commission has passed proposals that contravene basic human rights as if intentionally creating problems for Tsai. When voters elected her, they endorsed her political views.
During the authoritarian era, gender equality was openly suppressed. Not only were LGBT people stigmatized, but women were also discriminated against in the Civil Code. Taiwanese can finally enjoy gender equality, but marriage equality is still treated with utter contempt.
The commission should be composed of intelligent people, so how can they so quickly forget that Tsai’s pledge was endorsed by voters?
Marriage equality is a basic human right and also an important cornerstone of universal values. Should basic human rights be subject to voting?
If the commission members have a basic understanding of history and democracy, they should know how Taiwanese shook off the dark authoritarian era. Taiwanese must never forget how many LGBT people cried themselves to sleep because of the discrimination they faced.
The democratic way of life enjoyed today was created by all Taiwanese. How can it be that only heterosexuals are now allowed to enjoy this democracy?
Taiwanese are unlikely to forget that the Council of Grand Justices’ constitutional interpretation from May last year declared the Civil Code unconstitutional for its exclusion of same-sex marriage. The interpretation was an endorsement of the Tsai administration, yet the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) continues to equivocate on the issue.
The DPP, holding a legislative majority, promised to include the legalization of same-sex marriage on the legislative agenda, but it is clear that these were empty words. This offers anti-LGBT groups an opportunity.
Now that local elections are approaching, the issue is certain to be delayed further.
Only an utterly irresponsible political party would allow basic human rights to be decided in a referendum and it is a great humiliation to civil society.
Chen Fang-ming is a professor in the Graduate Institute of Taiwanese Literature at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with