It has been a rough few weeks for Facebook since the Observer reported the Cambridge Analytica data breach. The scandal revealed how the political consulting firm might have raked up the personal information of at least 87 million Facebook users to influence them with tailored political ads, sent the social network’s stocks into a tailspin, triggered the #DeleteFacebook movement — and regaled the planet with the cringefest that was chief executive Mark Zuckerberg’s testimony before the US Senate.
However, if Facebook’s reputation has seen better days, one of the company’s most valuable assets has come out of the kerfuffle practically unscathed.
Instagram, the photo-sharing platform Facebook acquired in 2012 for US$715 million, has not yet come up in the debate over Facebook’s cavalier attitude to user data protection, despite being of a piece with the longer-running social network (and being headquartered just a few blocks from Facebook’s Menlo Park campus in California). Prominent members of the #DeleteFacebook campaign, such as SpaceX’s Elon Musk, singer Cher, and Playboy magazine, are still pretty much present and active on Instagram.
Illustration: Lance Liu
The app’s apparent immunity to whatever befalls its owner and the possibility that this might not last even led a Reuters analyst to recommend that Facebook spin off Instagram as a separate company to shield it from reputational contagion.
Instagram’s cast-iron popularity confirms its emerging status as Facebook’s crown jewel. The app is gaining users at a breakneck pace: It only took it five months to leap from 700 million users in April last year to 800 million in September. It is especially popular with younger people: In March this year, a survey by the Pew Research Center found that 71 percent of Americans aged 18 to 24 were on Instagram, and that more than half of them visited it daily.
Moreover, it trounces other platforms at the engagement game: 2017 research by business intelligence firm L2 revealed that Instagram accounted for 92 percent of interactions taking place on social media, if only Facebook, Twitter and Instagram itself were considered; that dropped to a still whopping 42 percent if YouTube was also taken into account.
According to consumer data firm Statista, this year Instagram is expected to make up almost 28 percent of Facebook’s net mobile advertising revenue.
“If you measure success through the size of a community and then multiply it for engagement, Instagram gets 10 times the engagement that Facebook gets,” L2 founder and New York University professor Scott Galloway said. “In many ways, it’s currently the most successful platform in the world.”
Part of that success boils down to Instagram’s intrinsic qualities. Its visual-first model may be more appealing than Twitter’s or Facebook’s text-heavy makeup. In the absence of a share function, users only post their own pictures and videos, so there is no angsty clutter of links and reposts that took the joy out of other social networks.
“The genius of Facebook was the same [as Instagram’s] core habit: seeing other people’s photos,” said Nir Eyal, an angel investor and author of Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products. “On Facebook, that core habit was polluted with all the other junk in our feed. That’s causing a lot of the move to Instagram: people don’t want all the news, debate and politics.”
On the other hand, it is hard not to feel that Instagram lucked out, effectively airbrushing its public image amid Facebook’s whirlwind of scandals. It is worth noting, too, that many people do not know that Instagram belongs to Facebook: According to a recent DuckDuckGo survey, 56.9 percent of Americans are unaware of the connection. Not that Facebook or Instagram were ever keen on emphasizing that connection in their marketing material — a stance that, in retrospect, has paid off.
Yet Instagram shares many of the problems and flaws that have catapulted Facebook into the spotlight. The blight of fake news and foreign interference has marred Instagram at least as much as it has Facebook: According to Facebook’s own testimony before the US Congress, last year, 170 Instagram accounts were found to have spread propaganda from Russia’s Internet Research Agency, compared with only 120 Facebook pages.
“Instagram is as large a component of election propaganda as Facebook, if not larger,” said Jonathan Albright, a data journalist and research director at Columbia University’s Tow Center for Digital Journalism.
Although Instagram has not cropped up in the Cambridge Analytica affair, the ads appearing on the platform can be tailored for custom audiences directly from Facebook’s advertising dashboard — by leveraging Facebook data.
In the wake of the scandal, Facebook has hastened to make sure that Instagram’s data privacy practices were improved. Early last month, Instagram suddenly shut down access to its application programming interface (API), disrupting several third-party apps relying on it to glean user analytics. Days later, Instagram announced it was creating a tool that would enable users to download all the data they have shared on the platform — a move that brought it in line with Facebook (which made data portability possible in 2010) and with the EU’s soon-to-be-implemented General Data Protection Regulation.
In time, Instagram is also likely to come under increased scrutiny for other long-running, but unsolved issues, such as its impact on young users’ mental health, and the rise of Instagram influencers — people who make a living by featuring brands and products in their pictures for a fee. The field is unregulated, lacks transparency and is prone to abuse and fraud. However, Instagram could be in the process of sorting the issue out and possibly even making some money along the way.
Instagram’s artsy vibe and relative independence protected it from the flak lobbed at its parent company, but as the photo-sharing service coasts toward 1 billion users, its shortcomings cannot just be covered with a dreamy filter: The way Instagram handles these challenges will come to define it.
Potential pitfalls for Instagram
Russian roulette
According to Jonathan Albright, a data journalist and research director at Columbia University’s Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Instagram was one of Russia’s platforms of choice for sharing propaganda memes and videos ahead of the US presidential election in 2016. While Facebook pegged the number of US Instagram users reached by propaganda at about 20 million, Albright thinks that number could be much higher, as trolls resorted to third-party apps, such as Regrann, to repost content multiple times. Posts on Instagram might also have been more engaging than those shared on Facebook, possibly because of Instagram’s sleeker interface.
“Instagram had better engagement for these posts versus Facebook,” he said. “Facebook gets messy, people post their pictures, embeds, previews and the comments on the post get really disorganized. Instagram had better engagement for outrage, for people really getting angry and commenting more on-topic.”
While Instagram has removed the 170 profiles thought to be linked to Russia, Albright said it had not actually got rid of all the propaganda disseminated on the platform.
“The only things that were taken down were the original accounts, so if there’s any kind of screenshot or repost, it’s still around,” he said. “[Instagram] didn’t go back and filter or search anything.”
As of last month, some of the Russian-made memes could still be found lurking on Instagram, he added.
Celebs for sale
The airbrushed world of Instagram has helped bring about a new profession — that of online influencers. Influencers are social media users who, having commanded a high follower count, partner with brands to feature products in their posts, in exchange for freebies or money. While many niche “micro-influencers” ask brands for relatively small amounts, Instagram-famous personalities can make thousands of dollars for every picture, with celebrities like Kim Kardashian charging up to US$500,000 a post.
Influencers’ activity on Instagram increased by 198 percent between 2016 and last year, according to online marketing research firm Klear. The irresistible rise of this new category has created a host of new problems. Brands started fretting about “fake influencers,” followed by spurious armies of bots. Advertising authorities in various countries requested that influencers acknowledge that they are paid for promoting products, by adding the hashtag #ad to their posts. Last year, Instagram launched a branded content tool, which allows influencers to tag their partner brands more visibly in their posts. The feature was officially rolled out to enhance transparency and to provide brands with insights about the performance of influencers’ posts online, but social media firm Born Social strategy director Callum McCahon said it could end up changing the way the influencer industry works.
“Brands could be asked to pay for promoting their influencers’ posts and increasing their reach,” he said. “Instagram could then make money from brands boosting their influencers’ pictures. That’s not officially confirmed as of today, but that’s what Facebook did in the past.”
Mental health
In May last year, the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) published a report on social media’s impact on the mental health of young people. Instagram was labeled as the platform with the worst impact on its young users’ mental wellbeing. Problems ranged from anxiety and depression-inducing imagery to bullying and body image issues. A more recent study from the University of Notre Dame in Fremantle, Western Australia, revealed that young women exposed to the luridly filtered existences of Instagrammers were likely to feel bad about both their appearance and their general lifestyle and career.
Over the past few months, Instagram seems to have taken notice, introducing new tools, such as comment filters and pop-up alerts for problematic hashtags, that could help alleviate some of the mental health problems highlighted by researchers. Then, last month, during a Bloomberg event, the company announced the launch of a dedicated “wellbeing team” with the goal of making Instagram a “safer place, a place where people feel good.” The group’s strategy is still unclear, but at least it seems that Instagram has acknowledged that with greater power comes greater responsibility.
“It is surprising that Instagram has only recently launched the wellbeing team,” said Becky Inkster, an honorary research fellow at the University of Cambridge, who contributed to the RSPH study. “They need to be far more proactive with how they handle potential negative effect and harm.”
However, Inkster is optimistic about Instagram leading the way to better understanding of how images affect our mental welfare.
“Instagram can be a big player, and help in this area,” she said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations