At this moment of crisis in diplomatic relations, I am placing my hopes in the legislature being able to listen to those at the grassroots level. The main point is that since China has an “Anti-Secession” Law, the legislature should pass an anti-annexation act to allow Taiwan to initiate a process to rectify the title of the nation and write a new constitution. The idea is a battle of laws.
After the Dominican Republic severed relations, Taiwan has 19 diplomatic allies and talk about a “diplomatic collapse” is perhaps not an exaggeration.
However, Taiwanese understand that their diplomats are doing what they can in the face of the impossible, as there is every reason to expect that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime, which by its very nature is brutal, will continue to poach Taiwan’s diplomatic allies.
Pro-independence supporters feel that if this reaches zero or close to zero diplomatic allies, Taiwan would finally be able to shake off the Republic of China (ROC) and be set free.
Some might say that no country would recognize Taiwan’s new name and constitution, but we would rather start over, because shaking off the shackles of history and changing with the situation would allow us to create new possibilities.
Even the pro-unification camp would stand to benefit, as they could use the new system and new thinking to advocate for unification talks between “New Taiwan” and China, and try to win public support.
The aim of promoting an anti-annexation act is so that when there are no diplomatic allies left and China tries to annex Taiwan on the claim that the whole world thinks that Taiwan is part of China, Taiwan would have a set of predefined legal mechanisms in place that would allow the legislature to make a decision that authorizes the president to lead the nation through a legally defined process to rectify the national title and write a new constitution.
Article 2 of the Constitution states: “The sovereignty of the Republic of China shall reside in the whole body of citizens,” which makes the issue suitable for a referendum.
This means that if the People’s Republic of China (PRC) says that no country in the world recognizes the ROC, then we could change the nation’s name and system, and start over so long as Taiwanese agree on it. Even if no one recognizes the ROC, that does not mean that China can annex us.
At the very least, this mechanism would set the conditions for initiating a process of changing the national title and writing a new constitution. For example, if Taiwan loses almost all of its diplomatic allies, the legislature could take a vote to determine that the number of allies is approaching zero.
The legislature should authorize the president to set up a committee to rectify the national title and write a constitution. It could start the relevant preparatory work, which would include holding public hearings and organizing a consultative referendum to let voters decide whether to hold a referendum on rectifying the nation’s title and writing a new constitution or to simply hold an independence referendum.
In short, faced with a potential national crisis, the legislature should prepare a special legal mechanism for allowing the public to determine the nation’s future. The mechanism should take priority over a referendum and could be initiated at any time. It should determine the conditions and authorize the president to order the preparatory work and handle the referendum.
In other words, China has its “Anti-Secession” Law and Taiwan would have an anti-annexation act. Taiwan cannot continue to be bullied while remaining unable to respond.
Christian Fan Jiang is a media commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under