A battle for access to seaports is underway in one of the world’s unlikeliest places: Somalia, now caught up in a regional struggle between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on one side, with Qatar backed by Turkey on the other.
At stake: not just the busy waters off the Somalian coast, but the future stability of the nation itself.
Somalia has been at war for decades and until the last few years, it has struggled to attract foreign investment. However, rivalries in the nearby Arabian Peninsula are resulting in serious inflows into Somalia.
A year ago, a company owned by the UAE government signed a US$336 million contract to expand the port of Bosaso, north of Mogadishu in the semi-autonomous Somalian region of Puntland.
Less than a year before that, another UAE-owned firm took control of the Berbera port in the breakaway northern region of Somaliland and pledged up to US$440 million to develop it. In March, Ethiopia took a stake in the port for an undisclosed sum.
At the same time, Turkey, an ally of UAE-rival Qatar, is ramping up a multibillion-dollar investment push in Somalia. A Turkish company has run the Mogadishu port since 2014, while other Turkish firms have built roads, schools, and hospitals.
The rivalries have intensified since June last year, when the most powerful Arab states, led by Saudi Arabia and including the UAE, cut diplomatic ties with Qatar, accusing it of supporting Iran and Islamist militants.
That Middle Eastern feud is driving the desire to control the Horn of Africa and its waters, according to diplomats, businesspeople, academics and Somalian officials.
Somalia is close to vital oil routes and its ports could also serve landlocked Ethiopia, which has a population of 100 million.
Gulf nations have had trade and religious ties with Somalia for centuries, but those relationships are now up in the air as new rivalries emerge.
“Somalia has been caught in the middle of this effort to try to expand influence, commercial and military, along the coast,” said Rob Malley, president of the International Crisis Group, a think tank.
Saudi Arabia and the UAE view the Somalian coastline — and Djibouti and Eritrea to the north — as their “western security flank,” according to a senior Western diplomat in the Horn of Africa region.
Qatar and Turkey, whose investments are almost all in Mogadishu, are focused on supporting Somalian President Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed. He and his chief of staff are widely viewed in Somalia and by Western diplomats as loyal to Doha after receiving funds for their election campaign last year.
Doha had provided US$385 million in infrastructure, education and humanitarian assistance to the central Somalian government, a Qatari official said.
Making deals directly with regional governments in Somalia, as the UAE has done, undermined the central government, the official said.
Somalian Minister of Finance Abdirahman Duale Beileh agreed.
“The Gulf region has a lot of money and if they want to invest in Somalia, we welcome them with open arms,” he said. “But it’s a question of going through the right doors.”
The federal government in Mogadishu has long been at odds with the semi-autonomous regions of Puntland and Somaliland. The latter operates virtually as an independent state and has for years sought to secede from Somalia, but has not won international recognition.
DETRIMENTAL EFFECT
Less than a decade ago there was virtually no commercial interest in Somalia.
That began to change in 2011 when al-Qaeda-backed al-Shabaab militants retreated from Mogadishu. Months later, Turkey launched famine relief operations, opening the door for projects that now make it Somalia’s biggest foreign investor.
The government hopes that new investment, especially in infrastructure, can help the nation rebuild.
Better tax collection is boosting government revenues, but this only covers public-sector salaries. Huge amounts of capital are needed for roads, schools and other basics. Middle Eastern companies and charities could provide some of it.
However, the money could also destabilize the nation further by deepening tensions between the central government, aligned with Turkey and Qatar, and Puntland and Somaliland, which receive money from the UAE.
“These investments are having a detrimental effect on our political stability and worsening the relationship between our federal government and the regions,” former Somalian national security adviser Hussein Sheikh-Ali said. “This could cause a constitutional crisis that only al-Shabaab will benefit from.”
The Gulf crisis has already deepened rifts in Somalia. The central government has stayed neutral, to the annoyance of the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which Puntland and Somaliland have backed against Qatar.
“Getting out of this mess is very difficult,” Sheikh-Ali said. “Without unity we cannot.”
The Somalian presidency and the UAE government did not immediately respond to requests for comments.
Western nations fear that the Gulf rivalries playing out in Somalia could sideline their multibillion-dollar, UN-led efforts to build a functional Somalian army to fight al-Shabaab before the withdrawal of African Union peacekeepers in 2020.
TROUBLE
Political crises between Mogadishu and the regional authorities are undermining government efforts to strengthen financial systems and embark on other core tasks of a state, diplomats say.
The Gulf rivalry is also being felt on the ground in Somalia.
In the middle of April, Somalia and the UAE ended military cooperation. Since 2014, the UAE had trained and paid the salaries of Somalian troops in Mogadishu and built an anti-piracy force in Puntland. Hundreds of weapons were looted from the training center in Mogadishu as it shut down.
This came after Somalian security forces seized nearly US$10 million flown in from the UAE to pay soldiers and temporarily held the aircraft that brought the cash. The UAE also closed a hospital that offered free care.
Puntland officials last week traveled to Dubai to meet UAE counterparts and P&O, the state firm developing its port.
“Investing millions of dollars in Somalia at this critical juncture in history is very important for us,” Puntland President Abdiweli Mohamed Ali said.
Similarly, Somaliland officials hosted UAE diplomats last week to discuss “enhancing bilateral ties.”
“For Somalis themselves, this kind of geopolitical game of chess, where Somalia is solely a proxy conflict to the trouble in the Gulf, this is obviously bad news,” said Harry Verhoeven, a professor at Georgetown University Qatar.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs