India has constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech, and by some measures the biggest and most diverse media industry in the world, but journalists say they are increasingly facing intimidation aimed at stopping them from running stories critical of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his administration.
At least three senior editors have left their jobs at various influential media outlets in the past six months after publishing reports that angered the government or supporters of Modi’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), colleagues said.
Some reporters, as well as television anchors, have said that they have been threatened with physical harm, abused on social media and ostracized by Modi’s administration.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
In its annual World Press Freedom Index released on Wednesday, Paris-based Reporters Without Borders said that India was now 138th in the world out of 180 nations measured, down two positions since last year and lower than nations such as Zimbabwe, Afghanistan and Myanmar.
When the index was started in 2002, India was ranked 80th out of 139 nations surveyed.
Reporters Without Borders said that “with Hindu nationalists trying to purge all manifestations of ‘anti-national’ thought from the national debate, self-censorship is growing in the mainstream media and journalists are increasingly the targets of online smear campaigns by the most radical nationalists, who vilify them and even threaten physical reprisals.”
“Hate speech targeting journalists is shared and amplified on social networks, often by troll armies,” it added.
Spokesmen for the government declined comment on the accusations by journalists.
They did not immediately respond to the Reporters Without Borders report.
However, not all Indian journalists believe there is a problem.
Swapan Dasgupta, a lawmaker and a political columnist who supports Modi, said the press freedom ranking was “quite inexplicable.”
“I don’t believe there has been any shrinkage in the freedom of the media in the past few years,” Dasgupta said in an e-mail.
G.V.L. Narasimha Rao, a spokesman for the BJP, said allegations of media intimidation were far from the truth.
“On the contrary, the BJP has been a victim of the viciousness of large sections of the media that flourished under the patronage of the Congress, left and other opposition parties,” he said in e-mailed comments. “The unabashed bias of these media against the BJP has not dented our party’s political growth.”
Some journalists in India said they believe media freedoms are now under even more threat in the buildup to an election next year.
There have been some signs of increasing opposition to Modi’s economic policies and to the BJP’s muscular Hindu nationalism.
“India is going through an aggressive variant of McCarthyism against the media,” said Prannoy Roy, cofounder of NDTV, India’s first private news channel.
NDTV, which some BJP leaders have called the least friendly of India’s television channels, is being investigated for fraud by federal police.
The company has called it a witch hunt.
The government declined to respond to Roy’s comments.
Sagarika Ghose, a columnist with the Times of India, said she is viciously trolled for any criticism of the administration.
“The minute I write something, I get droves of hate mail,” Ghose said. “I have had death threats and gang rape threats on social media, and also through letters sent to my home. They know where I live.”
Ravish Kumar, a news anchor who has been scathing about the government in his program for NDTV’s Hindi-language channel, said he has been constantly harassed and threatened by pro-government activists.
“This is very organized,” he said. “They follow me. When I go out to report, a crowd gathers in 10 minutes.”
Reporters Without Borders counted instances of Indian journalists being killed because of what they write.
“At least three of the journalists murdered in 2017 were targeted in connection with their work,” it said.
Among them was editor and publisher Gauri Lankesh, a vocal advocate of secularism and a critic of right-wing political ideology.
A member of a hardline Hindu group has been arrested for the murder of Lankesh, who was gunned down outside her home.
Journalists say that media proprietors, who often have multiple kinds of businesses, are risk averse and can be leaned on by the government.
“Media proprietors are notorious for reading the tea leaves, they get a clear sense of the tolerance level of politicians in power,” said Siddharth Varadarajan, who runs a not-for-profit online news portal called The Wire. “Government ministers have coined this word, presstitute, to describe journalists who are unfriendly to them or who don’t do their bidding.”
Bobby Ghosh, the editor of the Hindustan Times, one of India’s premier broadsheets, quit in September last year shortly after Modi met the owner of the newspaper.
At least two senior journalists familiar with the situation said they were told that Modi was unhappy with Ghosh’s editorial policies.
The journalists said that Ghosh fell out of favor with the government after he launched a Web page called the Hate Tracker, a database of violent crimes based on religion, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation.
The database was taken down in October last year.
Ghosh declined to specify why he quit the Hindustan Times.
The prime minister’s office and the newspaper declined requests for comment on the matter.
A letter published at the time from the government’s chief spokesman Frank Noronha said Modi had met Hindustan Times chairwoman Shobhana Bhartia when she invited the prime minister to attend a conference organized by the newspaper.
“Other related assumptions and insinuations ... are baseless and denied,” Noronha said. “The government is committed to the freedom of the press.”
Restrictions on reporting are likely to intensify heading into the election, said Harish Khare, who resigned as editor-in-chief of the Tribune last month.
“It [the government] will use every resource in its command to pressurize, manipulate, misguide media or any other voice which seeks to be independent of the government,” said Khare, who was for some time the prime minister’s press secretary in the Congress Party government that lost power to Modi and the BJP in 2014.
He said his relations with the Tribune’s controlling trust nosedived after the newspaper published a story exposing flaws in Aadhar, the government’s national identity card project.
The newspaper’s trust rejected his accusations.
“To the contrary, the Tribune Trust gave an unprecedented award of 50,000 rupees [US$765] to the correspondent [who wrote the story] in recognition of the work,” officiating editor K.V. Prasad said in an e-mail. “The editor-in-chief’s departure came close to the end of the tenure.”
Additional reporting by Tom Lasseter and Sanjeev Miglani
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under