South Korea’s Yonhap news agency on Tuesday last week confirmed that the Blue House expects to announce an agreement to end the state of war with North Korea at today’s high-level summit between Seoul and Pyongyang. This would would bring an end to 65 years of hostilities between the two nations, which have been smoldering ever since they signed an armistice to end the fighting in the Korean War in 1953.
North Korean state media on Saturday reported that the government would halt nuclear missile tests of intercontinental ballistic missiles and would close its nuclear testing facilities, which if true, signals the end of a program that saw four nuclear tests and 89 missile launches conducted since North Korean leader Kim Jong-un assumed power in 2011.
At the beginning of this year, the Korean Peninsula was engulfed in nuclear brinkmanship, with observers in many countries agreeing that the two Koreas and the US were at the point of no return: War seemed inevitable.
Kim has now indicated that he wishes to channel his nation’s resources away from the military and into the development of a socialist economy.
Winds of change are blowing along the Korean Peninsula and there is now a light at the end of the tunnel.
As 19th-century British prime minister Lord Palmerston famously said: “Nations have no permanent friends or allies, they only have permanent interests.”
Consider this in relation to the cross-strait relationship between Taiwan and China. Since 1949 and the end of the Chinese Civil War and the creation of two rival governments, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Mao Zedong (毛澤東) used personal smear campaigns, labeling their counterpart a “bandit” and sought to cast their rival as the figurehead of a “local government” in an attempt to set the terms of the debate.
In 1991, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) amended the Constitution to limit the sovereign territory of the Republic of China (ROC) to Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, and also announced an end to the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款).
As such, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was no longer viewed by Taiwan’s government as a “rebel group,” but was recognized as a reciprocal political entity.
The Lee administration announced that it would no longer compete with the People’s Republic of China for recognition as “China” on the world stage.
Both sides should have been able to bury the hatchet and work toward peace.
However, unable to let go of outdated thinking, Beijing continued to obsess over the idea of a “unification of the Great Chinese nation” and not only advocated that it was the legitimate successor state, which means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the only legitimate and legal representative government of China, but also opposed Taiwan starting afresh, rejecting the idea that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent state.
It persisted with its hierarchical, master-and-slave cross-strait relationship, casting itself as the “legitimate” dynasty and the ROC as “illegitimate” one.
Beijing still arrogantly declares that “Taiwan is part of China,” ensuring that the clouds of war continue to hang over the Taiwan Strait.
China’s armed forces also continue to hold periodic live-fire exercises, war games, naval encirclements of Taiwan, long-term exercises and other forms of military coercion and hostile behavior.
The reason Taiwan and China have been unable to attain “spiritual affinity” or coexist as “one family” is not because of the President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) administration’s refusal to recognize the CCP’s so-called “1992 consensus,” or because Premier William Lai (賴清德) has said he is a “Taiwan independence worker.”
It is a result of Beijing’s long-standing policy of brushing aside historical facts and legal principles, and its refusal to accept reciprocal sovereignty for Taiwan.
If Beijing persists in using the outdated ROC/PRC model as a stick with which to beat Taiwan into submission and an increasingly confident Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) ramps up Beijing’s “peaceful offensive,” this is likely to spiral into a forced “peace through the barrel of a gun,” instead of the “moral and virtuous peace” of a benevolent ruler.
The cross-strait relationship should be based upon history, kinship, culture and geography to create a “band of brothers,” who hold a shared understanding that there are “a thousand reasons to mend the relationship and not one good reason to harm it.”
Beijing needs to dispense with its bully tactics, humbly place its will in the hands of the Taiwanese and respect the fact that they enjoy the freedom and autonomy to make choices about their future.
Both sides must work together to build a new relationship that rejects conflict and hostility, and promotes mutual respect and cooperation. Only then will Taiwan and China, similar to the two Koreas, have a realistic chance of putting past bitterness aside and working toward peace.
Masao Sun is a former director of the US Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office’s Culture Center.
Translated by Edward Jones
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under