Describing himself as a “political worker for Taiwanese independence,” Premier William Lai (賴清德) has proposed three pragmatic tenets: Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation and does not need to declare independence; the nation’s 23 million people alone have the right to determine Taiwan’s future; and he is leading the administrative team to build up the nation, develop the economy and make Taiwan stronger.
He has also proposed six directives: safeguarding the nation’s sovereignty; protecting its freedom, democracy and human rights; developing the economy; safeguarding the public’s right to decide Taiwan’s future; having confidence in cross-strait relations; and maintaining peaceful cross-strait development.
Lai’s proclamation was obviously based on a consensus reached between his Cabinet and President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) team. The focus of the tenets lies in the second half of the first sentence: “Taiwan ... does not need to declare independence,” which is a response to the independence referendum proposed by the Formosa Alliance.
The six directives describe what any government over the land and people of Taiwan may and should do. Simply put, they are the wrapping and Tsai’s policy of maintaining the “status quo” is the content.
As a pragmatic Taiwanese independence advocate, Lai should first and foremost rectify the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration’s “non-pragmatic” policies. Under Tsai, Lai and his Cabinet must have seen that the Republic of China Constitution is both a sham and anachronistic, and that the rights and responsibilities of government bodies are ambiguous.
No independent country would obey a constitution stipulated by a foreign, colonialist exile regime. The first duty of a pragmatic Taiwanese independence advocate is therefore to write a constitution focused on the land and people of Taiwan.
Second, as Taiwan’s future can be decided by its 23 million people alone, writing a referendum act that allows them to determine their future is a pragmatic approach to implementing Taiwanese independence.
Third, joining the international community and striving for participation in international organizations under the nation’s real name — Taiwan — is the only pragmatic policy that will safeguard the interests of Taiwan — not China — and boost the nation’s economy.
Applying this pragmatic approach, Lai and his Cabinet should propose a referendum act that would allow Taiwanese to write a new constitution and determine the nation’s future; propose a draft Taiwanese constitution and push for a constitutional referendum; and forcefully encourage the development of diplomatic policy and policies for participation in international organizations under the name “Taiwan.”
The name and content of the Constitution is the source of every substantial problem in Taiwan. It is the elephant in the room, invisible only to the blind and those who pretend not to see.
The first duty of a pragmatic Taiwanese independence advocate in a position of power is to hold a constitutional referendum and join the international community as a legitimate country.
This pragmatic approach to Taiwanese independence differs slightly from that of the alliance, in that a constitutional referendum would replace the alliance’s proposed independence referendum.
If Lai or the DPP administration keep evading or even blocking a constitutional referendum and UN membership, then they are being hypocrites, not pragmatists, and as such they would be completely unconvincing and devoid of public appeal.
Lin Kien-tsu is a member of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and