In November 1947, one day prior to the expected UN vote on partitioning Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state, the CIA urged then-US president Harry Truman not to throw his weight behind the idea.
The US would have to defend the new Jewish state when it faltered, the agency’s secret memorandum said, adding that “the Jews will be able to hold out no longer than two years.”
Several months later, David Ben-Gurion was about to declare the establishment of the State of Israel. Seated among the dozen or so men who would determine the fate of the state-to-be, he famously turned to one of his top military commanders, Yigael Yadin, and asked him if he thought a new Jewish state would survive the military onslaught that the Arabs would inevitably launch.
Yadin, who would later serve as chief of staff of the Israeli Defense Forces, replied that he thought the Jewish state would have a 50-50 chance.
Today, those bleak assessments feel like ancient history. As the modern Israeli state celebrates 70 years, the prevailing sentiment is one of extraordinary accomplishment.
US Jewish leaders were incensed in 1948 when Ben-Gurion came to the US and spoke about the fledgling state as the new center of the Jewish world; today, that status is nowhere in doubt.
In 1948, there were about 650,000 Jews in Israel, who represented about 5 percent of the world’s Jews. Today, Israel’s Jewish population has grown 10-fold and stands at about 6.8 million people.
About 43 percent of the world’s Jews by some estimates live in Israel; this population overtook Jewish Americans several years ago and is now the world’s largest Jewish community. Israel’s birthrate, even among secular Jews, is higher than that of any other nation in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and significantly higher than that of Jewish Americans, who now account for about 34 percent of Jews worldwide.
Beyond mere survival, the other challenge that the young Jewish state faced was feeding and housing the hundreds of thousands of Jews who were flocking to its borders.
At times, financial collapse appeared imminent. Food was rationed and black markets developed. Israel had virtually no heavy machinery to build the infrastructure that it desperately needed. Until Germany started paying Holocaust reparations, the young state’s financial condition was perilous.
Today, that worry also feels like a relic from another time. Israel is not only a significant military power — and in the region, a superpower — but also a formidable economic machine.
A worldwide center for technology that has more companies listed on the NASDAQ than any nation other than the US, Israel’s economy barely hiccuped in 2008. The New Israeli Shekel, its currency, is strong. Like other nations, Israel has a worrisome income gap between rich and poor, but fears of an economic collapse have vanished.
Israel has become an important cultural center, vastly disproportionately for a country whose population approximates that of New York City. When the five finalists for the Man Booker International Prize for literature were announced last year, two were Israelis who write in Hebrew: David Grossman and Amos Oz. Grossman won.
Ever since S.Y. Agnon received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1966, the Israeli literary scene has been punching far above its weight.
When Israel was founded, Ben-Gurion sought to block television altogether, as he thought it would have a deleterious effect on Israeli education and culture. He failed in that attempt, but for decades, Israel had but one television channel.
Today, Americans and Europeans alike wait hungrily for new episodes of Israeli shows like Fauda, while others have been remade into US and British series, such as Homeland and The A Word.
On the occasion of Independence Day, which was celebrated on Thursday, Israelis are fully conscious — and deeply proud — of the fact that their nation has exceeded the ambitions of the men and women who founded it seven decades ago.
However, some of the initial worries and troubles of those early years persist.
Militarily, the looming enemy is not the Palestinians, with whom peace remains utterly elusive, but Iran. The Israeli military is bracing for a possible Iranian missile or drone attack.
International support for Israel remains a concern: In 1948, many Jewish Americans were deeply conflicted about the creation of a Jewish state. Solidarity eventually grew, but today the relationship has become increasingly fraught.
Israelis got a stark reminder this week that some of the social ills that have long plagued the country persist.
Several days ago, Haaretz, Israel’s “paper of record,” asked its writers which Israeli song they most despise. When one said that he hates the national anthem, a furious Twitter discussion ensued.
At one point, a woman annoyed at having her focus on security dismissed by the Haaretz editors, said on Twitter: “It’s thanks to my ideology that you live like a king in this country and can write and distribute your absurd newspaper with no impediments.”
Haaretz publisher Amos Schocken, the son of its previous publisher, retorted in a tweet that he subsequently deleted: “You insolent woman. My family was leading Zionism when you were still climbing on trees. Haaretz has been in the Schocken family for 83 years; we did fine without your ideology and will continue to.”
Seventy years after its founding, the once-ruling Israeli Labor Party has virtually no political influence. There are many reasons for that, but its reputation as an elitist, out-of-touch clan of European intellectuals is prime among them. Neither the Haaretz crowd nor the Israeli non-European Jewish majority is likely to alter its views of the other.
Despite the many questions surrounding the Jewish state as it enters its ninth decade, what seems almost certain is that it will be not Ben-Gurion’s founding Labor Party, but the once marginal and now powerful political right that will rule this still young and fascinating nation for the foreseeable future.
Daniel Gordis is senior vice president and Koret distinguished fellow at Shalem College in Jerusalem. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under