In November 1947, one day prior to the expected UN vote on partitioning Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state, the CIA urged then-US president Harry Truman not to throw his weight behind the idea.
The US would have to defend the new Jewish state when it faltered, the agency’s secret memorandum said, adding that “the Jews will be able to hold out no longer than two years.”
Several months later, David Ben-Gurion was about to declare the establishment of the State of Israel. Seated among the dozen or so men who would determine the fate of the state-to-be, he famously turned to one of his top military commanders, Yigael Yadin, and asked him if he thought a new Jewish state would survive the military onslaught that the Arabs would inevitably launch.
Yadin, who would later serve as chief of staff of the Israeli Defense Forces, replied that he thought the Jewish state would have a 50-50 chance.
Today, those bleak assessments feel like ancient history. As the modern Israeli state celebrates 70 years, the prevailing sentiment is one of extraordinary accomplishment.
US Jewish leaders were incensed in 1948 when Ben-Gurion came to the US and spoke about the fledgling state as the new center of the Jewish world; today, that status is nowhere in doubt.
In 1948, there were about 650,000 Jews in Israel, who represented about 5 percent of the world’s Jews. Today, Israel’s Jewish population has grown 10-fold and stands at about 6.8 million people.
About 43 percent of the world’s Jews by some estimates live in Israel; this population overtook Jewish Americans several years ago and is now the world’s largest Jewish community. Israel’s birthrate, even among secular Jews, is higher than that of any other nation in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and significantly higher than that of Jewish Americans, who now account for about 34 percent of Jews worldwide.
Beyond mere survival, the other challenge that the young Jewish state faced was feeding and housing the hundreds of thousands of Jews who were flocking to its borders.
At times, financial collapse appeared imminent. Food was rationed and black markets developed. Israel had virtually no heavy machinery to build the infrastructure that it desperately needed. Until Germany started paying Holocaust reparations, the young state’s financial condition was perilous.
Today, that worry also feels like a relic from another time. Israel is not only a significant military power — and in the region, a superpower — but also a formidable economic machine.
A worldwide center for technology that has more companies listed on the NASDAQ than any nation other than the US, Israel’s economy barely hiccuped in 2008. The New Israeli Shekel, its currency, is strong. Like other nations, Israel has a worrisome income gap between rich and poor, but fears of an economic collapse have vanished.
Israel has become an important cultural center, vastly disproportionately for a country whose population approximates that of New York City. When the five finalists for the Man Booker International Prize for literature were announced last year, two were Israelis who write in Hebrew: David Grossman and Amos Oz. Grossman won.
Ever since S.Y. Agnon received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1966, the Israeli literary scene has been punching far above its weight.
When Israel was founded, Ben-Gurion sought to block television altogether, as he thought it would have a deleterious effect on Israeli education and culture. He failed in that attempt, but for decades, Israel had but one television channel.
Today, Americans and Europeans alike wait hungrily for new episodes of Israeli shows like Fauda, while others have been remade into US and British series, such as Homeland and The A Word.
On the occasion of Independence Day, which was celebrated on Thursday, Israelis are fully conscious — and deeply proud — of the fact that their nation has exceeded the ambitions of the men and women who founded it seven decades ago.
However, some of the initial worries and troubles of those early years persist.
Militarily, the looming enemy is not the Palestinians, with whom peace remains utterly elusive, but Iran. The Israeli military is bracing for a possible Iranian missile or drone attack.
International support for Israel remains a concern: In 1948, many Jewish Americans were deeply conflicted about the creation of a Jewish state. Solidarity eventually grew, but today the relationship has become increasingly fraught.
Israelis got a stark reminder this week that some of the social ills that have long plagued the country persist.
Several days ago, Haaretz, Israel’s “paper of record,” asked its writers which Israeli song they most despise. When one said that he hates the national anthem, a furious Twitter discussion ensued.
At one point, a woman annoyed at having her focus on security dismissed by the Haaretz editors, said on Twitter: “It’s thanks to my ideology that you live like a king in this country and can write and distribute your absurd newspaper with no impediments.”
Haaretz publisher Amos Schocken, the son of its previous publisher, retorted in a tweet that he subsequently deleted: “You insolent woman. My family was leading Zionism when you were still climbing on trees. Haaretz has been in the Schocken family for 83 years; we did fine without your ideology and will continue to.”
Seventy years after its founding, the once-ruling Israeli Labor Party has virtually no political influence. There are many reasons for that, but its reputation as an elitist, out-of-touch clan of European intellectuals is prime among them. Neither the Haaretz crowd nor the Israeli non-European Jewish majority is likely to alter its views of the other.
Despite the many questions surrounding the Jewish state as it enters its ninth decade, what seems almost certain is that it will be not Ben-Gurion’s founding Labor Party, but the once marginal and now powerful political right that will rule this still young and fascinating nation for the foreseeable future.
Daniel Gordis is senior vice president and Koret distinguished fellow at Shalem College in Jerusalem. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In a recent interview with commentator Hugh Hewitt, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo dropped a bomb. It was simple, direct and succinct, and it was one that has been long overdue. When Hewitt asked him about Taiwan, Pompeo wasted no words. He stressed how important it is “to get the language right.” Then, with no further comment, he went on to say: “Taiwan has not been a part of China.” In that one brief statement, Pompeo blew the US’ longstanding, official, 75-year-old “undecided” position on Taiwan out of the water and definitely put the US on a new track. There was more. In doing
I think it is fair to say there is a widespread sigh of relief among many Americans — particularly those of us focused on foreign policy — that the chaotic and unpredictable Trump years will soon be over. Mr. Trump brought little real knowledge or experience to his foreign policy, and it showed. He also — in my humble opinion — did not err on the side of expertise in his choice of top foreign policy officials. Nor was he particularly open to listening to advice. All in all a poor set of traits for overseeing the complex foreign policy
After more than eight years of talks, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was signed on Nov. 15, combining the individual free-trade agreements signed between ASEAN member states on the one hand, and China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand on the other. Under the leadership of ASEAN and China, most observers did not expect the RCEP to provide a high degree of openness, and the announced agreement lives up to these expectations, containing few surprises. All products covered by the RCEP tariff reductions are agricultural and industrial products, but reductions of agricultural product tariffs are very limited, for example covering
While the nation grapples with its falling birthrate, it is also imperative to address how parents are raising their children. The phenomenon of “dinosaur parents” — who lash out at teachers, store staff or people on the street when confronted about their children misbehaving — has been an issue for a while, but there seems to be an uncomfortably high number of incidents making the news lately. On Saturday, a preschool teacher on an online forum wrote about a mother who often visited the school and screamed at the staff for various reasons — including her child being late to school