After decades of attempts to lower the voting age in Taiwan, it was almost like a major victory when the Legislative Yuan lowered the voting age for referendums from 20 to 18 in December last year. However, such optimism is misleading, as 18-year-olds still cannot vote in elections, which are governed by a separate set of laws. Taiwan remains one of a handful of nations with such a high voting age.
The Taiwan Alliance for Advancement of Youth Rights and Welfare and the New Power Party on Monday called for the government to speed up the process to lower the voting age, noting that none of the eight proposals now before the legislature have passed a second reading.
Is this a similar attitude as the government’s “we’ll celebrate the Council of Grand Justices’ ruling on same-sex marriage as a huge achievement, but same-sex couples cannot actually get married and we are not doing anything to hasten the process even though we promised to do so” approach? Only time will tell.
Allowing 18-year-olds to vote is obvious — they are legally adults, they are eligible for military service, and a nation benefits from having its young people more engaged socially and politically — it is not that hard to understand. This is especially important in Taiwan, which needs as many people to care about the nation’s future as possible.
Previously, high-school students were supposed to live in a bubble and as long as they studied hard, they would have a good future. This is no longer the case, and the government is placing more emphasis on practical education — what can be better education than real-world political participation?
It is always a good sign to see university students becoming involved in social and political movements, but it is ironic that some of these young activists cannot vote.
With optimism for democracy over the next decade among 20-to-39-year-olds dropping from 58 percent in 2001 to 41.1 percent this year, according to a poll commissioned by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, getting more young people to feel their voices are heard is crucial for Taiwan to move forward.
However, every attempt has failed since the issue was first brought up in 1994. It seems that even the public is divided on the issue, as a poll last month by news Web site ET Today found that only 52.9 percent of respondents were in favor of a lower voting age.
Other polls have found more or less the same numbers, which is perhaps why it has taken so long for this change to get off the ground.
Yes, there will always be overly immature young people, which seems to be the main argument against letting 18-year-olds vote — but there are plenty of immature older people. Age does not matter when it comes to character, political knowledge and motivation. We cannot continue to shut out an entire age group just because of their lack of experience.
What the government should stop doing is treating the issue as a bargaining chip. An amendment was almost passed in 2015, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Democratic Progressive Party could not come to an agreement after 13 hours of tense debate, even though they were both in favor of the proposal. The two parties seemed to care more about their agendas and rivalries than the nation’s interests.
However, the work will not be done even once the voting age is lowered. Look at Japan, where 18-year-olds were able to vote for the first time in 2016, but early opinion polls found a low willingness to actually vote among that demographic.
It took a collaborative educational campaign from the government, schools, non-profit organizations and public figures to get the 18-year-old voting rate to 51 percent.
If and when the government finally does change the voting age in Taiwan, similar education and get-out-and-vote campaigns are just as crucial as changes to the law, if not, more so.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under