An ‘opposition’ office
On Monday, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) issued a statement that took the unusual step of criticizing Premier William Lai (賴清德) by name, saying that some things he has said were an arrogant challenge to the “status quo” in cross-strait relations, and were very dangerous and presumptuous.
Surely the TAO has gone too far by so brazenly criticizing the government official to whom its Taiwanese counterpart, the Mainland Affairs Council, directly answers.
Considering that TAO Director Liu Jieyi (劉結一) only took up his post on March 19, this statement could be seen as a beginner testing the waters.
Given Liu’s background in China’s diplomatic establishment, it could be said that he has lost his footing and seems to have forgotten that the TAO’s purpose is to act as a lubricant in cross-strait relations, not a bottle of chili sauce.
Is it a matter of an overenthusiastic new official, or is Liu confused about China’s policies toward Taiwan?
Whichever it might be, Liu is to blame for getting things wrong.
This is not the first time that Lai has called himself a “Taiwan independence worker.”
He said the same thing in the legislature on Sept. 26 last year, but because he said it less than 30 days before the 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the main concern of which was to ensure a smooth transition of power, China let the matter drop without saying anything.
Then Lai mentioned the idea again during a general question-and-answer session in the legislature on Friday last week. He was expressing his own will and making a statement about his personal political life.
If and when he takes part in elections, these ideas of his will be put before Taiwanese voters for their approval or rejection.
Public opinion would then show what people think about the TAO’s claim that Lai’s statements have seriously provoked mainstream public opinion on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, and harmed cross-strait peace and stability.
If Taiwanese choose to take Lai’s side, thus directly affirming his ideas, what is the TAO, which is now ranting and raving about them, going to do with itself?
Will it change its name to “Opposition Affairs Office” and keep on saying the opposite to what Taiwanese think?
Shih Ya-hsuan
Kaohsiung
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs