You might think Hungary is a faraway country. Small and landlocked, it has a baffling Finno-Ugric language few outsiders master. What do its corruptions and conspiracy theories have to do with the UK?
When I was in Budapest in August last year, I met Marta Pardavi. I worried about her and her friends in the Hungarian human rights movement, but I did not think I needed to transfer my fears back to the UK.
To understand her predicament, you must know that the ruling party, Fidesz, and its president, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, rigs the constitution, the electoral system, most of the media, the judiciary and Hungary’s cultural institutions.
The handmaiden of autocracy is corruption. If Hungarians want to see a doctor or win a government contract, they have learned to reach into their pockets. Budapest is not a European capital now: It is Moscow on the Danube.
Because any sane electorate would throw him out, Orban needs an enemy to scare Hungarians into voting for him on Sunday. He has come up with a novel combination of anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim bigotry. A classic dish with a modern twist, you might say: Two “others” for the price of one.
The Hungarian state has saturated the country with propaganda portraying the liberal Hungarian-Jewish financier George Soros as a menace to the nation. The rootless cosmopolitan is planning “to resettle at least 1 million immigrants annually” in the EU in general and Hungary in particular, Fidesz said.
As Soros does not command a government, Fidesz would have struggled to explain how he could flood Europe with Muslims. It is as if British ministers were pretending the choice before the electorate was between the Conservative party and Human Rights Watch.
However, Orban rarely has to explain. Most TV stations and newspapers obey the government and their hack propagandists have worked to turn the marginal non-governmental organizations (NGOs) Soros funds, with no power beyond the ability to seek judicial review of the treatment of refugees, into agents of a supernaturally powerful Jew.
When I met Pardavi, the state-sponsored attacks on her Hungarian Helsinki Committee were so extreme they appeared to me to be an incitement to violence.
She shrugged and said that was the price of working in Hungary.
The climate has turned colder since the summer. If Fidesz wins re-election, it has promised laws that would treat NGOs as threats to national security.
Meanwhile, someone is running black ops against the Helsinki Committee and the Civil Liberties Union for Europe.
Imposters posing as sympathizers have tried to trap human rights workers into making off-the-cuff remarks Orban can twist and use against them.
You might think Hungary is a faraway country, but former US White House chief strategist Steve Bannon does not think so.
He praised Orban as “the most significant guy on the scene right now.”
Orban showed how German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to allow columns of refugees to march across Europe could create huge opportunities for the far right. And not only in Hungary and Poland, whose government is imitating Orban’s tactics with dog-like devotion.
Although no one could be further from a demagogue than British Prime Minister Theresa May, it remains a matter of record that the Brexit campaign won with the help of the fake claim that Turkey was about to join the EU — two years on and it is still outside — and with posters depicting the coming Muslim invasion.
Beyond these scares lie faint signs of trouble to come. I have watched men and women I once admired turn from principled opposition to Muslim reactionaries into opponents of any version of Islam. I am talking about a handful of people, but consider how their numbers might grow on the “respectable” right.
The EU has been its “other” since former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher’s last days. Where will the right turn when Britain leaves? The terms of the divorce will be so bad that perhaps the right will carry on blaming the EU for its failures for years to come.
However, if it needs a new enemy to motivate its base, one only has to look to Orban or US President Donald Trump to guess who that “other” might be.
As for Orban’s cosmically evil Jews, turn to the British left. For a generation, its dominant voices have failed to draw a line between criticism of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and fascist ideology.
Like right-wingers who no longer care about the difference between opposition to radical Islam and anti-Muslim bigotry, they accept no restraint.
It cannot be repeated often enough that anti-Semitism is a racist theory of power. Leftists have always been susceptible to the “socialism of fools,” because in their worst moments they believe democracy and human rights are shams hiding the capitalist puppet masters. It is all too easy to move from saying the puppet masters are the “capitalists” to the puppet masters are the Jews.
To stay only with British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, he has taken the shilling of the Iranian state — which is not only anti-Semitic, but misogynist and homophobic — defended a more-than-usually-vicious vicar who said Jews were the secret conspirators behind 9/11, a mural that paid homage to Nazi conspiratorial “art” and a Palestinian activist who revived the medieval conspiracy that Jews drank the blood of Christian children. Rather late in the day, he decided it was politically prudent to repent.
However, mark the reaction of his supporters last week. They did not believe Corbyn’s contrition was sincere. Thousands signed a letter stating that he was a victim of a “very powerful special interest group,” or as British Labour Party activist Christine Shawcroft put it after defending an alleged Holocaust denier (as you do): “This whole row is being stirred up to attack Jeremy.”
In Budapest, the far right has Jews plotting to destroy Christian Europe by bringing in Muslims. In London, the far left has Jews plotting to destroy the Labour leader with fake accusations of racism.
Hungary is a faraway country, you say. Not so far away.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry