The registration for the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Taipei mayoral primary closed on March 16, with four people — former legislators Ting Shou-chung (丁守中), Sun Ta-chien (孫大千) and Chang Hsien-yao (張顯耀) and Taipei City Councilor Chung Hsiao-ping (鍾小平) — signing up.
As for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), several members have expressed their intention to run, but whether the party will contest the election remains uncertain.
Most KMT members would be happy to see a DPP candidate taking the deep-green vote from Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), in the hope that the split would give the KMT the mayorship.
Still, the KMT must be cautious lest it sees a repetition of the 2010 Kaohsiung mayoral election, when its candidate came in last.
That was the first election after Kaohsiung city and county were merged. Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) won the DPP primary, defeating former Kaohsiung county commissioner Yang Chiu-hsing (楊秋興).
Unhappy over what he saw as attacks against him during the primary, Yang left the party and ran as an independent against Chen and KMT candidate Huang Chao-shun (黃昭順).
At first, the KMT was elated over the prospect of a DPP split, but then Yang shifted his stance on cross-strait policy toward the KMT.
In the end, Chen received 52.8 percent of the vote (821,089 votes), while Huang ended up in third place, 6 percentage points behind Yang.
The number of votes Chen gathered in 2010 was similar to then-DPP candidate Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) Kaohsiung vote during the 2012 presidential election (883,158), while Yang’s and Huang’s combined total (734,124) was about equal to KMT candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and People First Party James Soong’s (宋楚瑜) total (769,930).
Yang’s independent candidacy drew most of his support from the pan-blue camp.
In the Nov. 24 Taipei mayoral election, if Ko maintains the position on cross-strait issues that he held four years ago — which was closer to the DPP’s — the KMT stands a good chance of winning.
However, Ko has modified his position over the past four years, although it might just be sophistry. After all, even pro-independence stalwart Koo Kwang-ming (辜寬敏) has said that Taiwan and China can be “brothers,” close, but separate countries.
That implies Ko’s talk of Taiwan and China being one family with a “shared destiny” could still be interpreted as the two sides being two separate countries.
However, the general public tends to respond instinctively and hearing the shift in Ko’s position would make many think he is moving closer to the KMT.
If the KMT nominates a candidate with a low support rating, while the DPP puts forward an unexpectedly competitive candidate to win pro-green voters, pro-blue camp supporters might abandon the KMT to vote for Ko — whose current position at first blush seems to resemble their own — to prevent the DPP candidate from winning.
Looking at the Taipei mayoral election results over the past decade, it would not be impossible for Ko to win with 510,000 votes, placing him ahead of the DPP with 500,000 votes and the KMT with 490,000.
Instead of waiting for the DPP to make a mistake, the KMT should prepare itself by strengthening its candidate’s program to make him more attractive to voters.
Chi Chieh is a youth member of the KMT’s Huang Fu-hsing branch.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations