Aside from a few die-hard pro-unification Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members, almost all Taiwanese are elated with the passage of the US’ Taiwan Travel Act. The act opens doors for more extended contact, shared consultation and recognition.
Similarly, most were pleased in 2016 when President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) called then-US president-elect Donald Trump to congratulate him on his victory. Both happenings made long overdue statements on recognizing the reality of Taiwan’s independent, sovereign status in the world.
However, lest any be tempted to rest or pat themselves on the back that these accomplishments guarantee Taiwan’s salvation, a more proper attitude would be Machiavellian pragmatism. The future must be faced with eyes wide open, especially with regard to Trump.
Eyes wide open means recognizing that while all this is beneficial to Taiwan, Trump’s administration has its own problems with transparency, credibility and lack of a consistent strategy. This remains a clear and ever-present danger.
Examine immediate past inconsistencies. The joy over Tsai’s telephone call was soon overshadowed by Trump’s hosting of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at Mar-a-Lago, Florida.
After they tasted “the best chocolate cake ever,” Trump indicated that Xi, in 10 minutes, explained how extremely complicated North Korea was and that he, Trump, would now consult with Xi before acting on Taiwan matters.
Fortunately for Taiwan, Trump’s mind again flip-flopped in a new direction as he focused on new business leverage for the US. He resorted to heavy trade tariffs not only on China, but also on allies all over the world.
Ironically, Trump then began making a list of exceptions almost as fast as he levied tariffs. He was “winging it” once more.
Put simply, eyes wide open for Taiwan means carefully examining the credibility and challenges that Trump’s “winging it” creates on the world stage as well as in the US.
He may boast about his intuition and being smarter than his generals, but in reality, it is not genius he counts on, but hyped subterfuge, lack of transparency and even “lies” to cover up numerous past failures.
Two of his many strong diverse “winging it” failures are found in Trump University and Trump Taj Mahal Casino, where, like others, tax returns hide how bad they were.
To run a credible university one needs expertise and transparency. Trump University failed on both counts. It was never accredited and quickly became for students a participatory lesson in the “Art of the Con.”
Hoping to learn alleged get-rich-quick secrets of property development, students instead got “motivational pep talks.” In Oliver Twist fashion it was “Fagin’s school for Artful Dodgers” reborn with a brand name. Students did sue and won their case, but they did not get all their money back.
Trump’s Taj Mahal Casino provided a different example. Casinos allegedly cannot fail. Even professional gamblers enter a casino knowing that the odds are “rigged in favor of the house.” However, a casino must still run a tight ship beyond hype; it cannot wing it.
So how did Trump’s casino go bankrupt? One need not go into all the details, but it failed to report money laundering and, for the rest, Trump’s hidden tax returns cover the trail.
Fast forward to the present where “winging it” is found in the revolving door of White House staff appointments. Each appointee is always a hyped “great selection” until six or eight months later when he or she leaves. These here today, gone tomorrow problems exacerbate staff credibility whenever they speak, because their words are expected to quickly become yesterday’s news.
Whether they be the secretary of state, national security advisor, White House press secretary or others, they are not the wisest ones in the room and there is no overall plan.
Even if they say that they speak for Trump, the validity of what they say is too frequently contradicted by the next Trump tweet. For this reason, observers can barely hold back an eye-roll, especially when these officials expect to be taken seriously.
As for White House appointments, in place of hidden tax returns, loyalty oaths and non-disclosure agreements, such as those signed by a growing number of porn stars, seem to be de rigueur before taking office in this White House-on-the-fly.
Awareness of this lack of strategy increases when one realizes that the US still has more than 40 vacant ambassadorships. That does not bode well for the country.
Some will try to excuse these problems by saying that Trump’s style is to create chaos where two sides fight it out and he reserves the final answer for himself. This might work in scripted reality TV shows such as The Apprentice, but it fails when real people and other national interests are involved.
No, running a country is not like a real-estate deal, where the trick is to find prime land and follow the elementary buy-low and sell-high principle, or where sales can be further aided if one knows clients who want to launder money or escape paying heavy divorce settlement sums in the deal.
This is the world of Trump. His lack of strategy has already managed to insult most US allies in its zero-sum game approach. They are learning to distrust his words.
Taiwanese officials, therefore, should not spend too much time trying to figure out a strategy that is not there. The reality is that Trump is winging it.
Instead, Taiwan must understand its own position. It is not able to treat Trump with tit-for-tat responses as the EU or larger nations such as Russia or China do.
However, it is a mid-sized nation and has a strong GDP. It has neighbors like Japan that have much to lose if Taiwan becomes undemocratic. Taiwan also has other allies in Asia and allies within the US.
Taiwan’s major threat is still China and if push comes to shove with China’s hegemony, Taiwan is a defensible island and well-suited to guerrilla warfare even after landings have been made. With 23 million people in a tight space, China would need a tremendous occupying army even if it won.
These are the facts that Taiwan must work with.
One must be Machiavellian and take any given advantages and run. With eyes wide open and knowing its strengths, Taiwan can avoid disappointment and profit in the future.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this