It all started with the Pyeongchang Winter Olympics in South Korea, where North and South Korea fielded a joint team.
The event was attended by a North Korean delegation that included North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s sister. This led to a South Korean delegation visiting Pyongyang, who were received with great fanfare by Kim and his administration.
They were conveyed a message from Kim that he was ready for a summit with US President Donald Trump to talk about denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, which Trump has accepted, but added that sanctions against Pyongyang would remain in place until an agreement is reached.
It has all been so sudden, coming after the rhetorical, but dangerous, exchange of insults between the two leaders, with Trump deriding Kim as a “little rocket man” and threatening to unleash “fire and fury.”
Kim responded by saying: “I will surely and definitely tame the mentally deranged US dotard with fire.”
So what has led to this sudden change of the atmosphere? The severity of the sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council is regarded as the prime reason.
The sanctions are starting to hurt North Korea, especially after their strict enforcement to prevent any leakage that has helped Pyongyang to circumvent the blockade. Even its ally, China, has put on the squeeze just short of completely cutting off its arteries, lest a complete collapse of the regime create more problems for China, such as an exodus of refugees across its border.
Beijing has welcomed this development.
“We welcome the positive signals by the US and North Korea about having direct dialogue. The Korean Peninsula issue is moving in the right direction toward its settlement,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Geng Shuang (耿爽) said.
To suggest that the Korean Peninsula issue is moving toward its settlement is an overstatement, when even the parameters of the proposed summit are vague, to say the least.
China should know from past experience that even when it hosted talks to resolve the nuclear issue, they simply fizzled out. It is still not clear what sort of role, if any, Beijing would play to advance the process of dialogue, if it were come to that.
It must be said that Pyongyang has played its cards well so far by creating a semblance of North-South amity, starting with the Winter Olympics and using Seoul as the conduit to facilitate any dialogue with the US.
Although Seoul continues to insist, as does the US, that denuclearization of North Korea is the first order of any talks, it is difficult to envisage that Pyongyang would simply surrender.
Under Kim, North Korea has hastened to acquire the trappings of a dangerous nuclear power, even claiming that its missiles can now reach the US to inflict maximum damage. North Korea cannot be trifled with.
At the same time, if Pyongyang were serious about denuclearization, it would need to show some serious intent.
Pyongyang would believe that it has shown that intent by stopping its testing of nuclear weapons and missiles, as it did during the Winter Olympics and would likely continue during the summit and the follow-up dialogue.
This, in turn, might create a momentum to continue the process. Therefore, the first step is a moratorium on North Korea’s nuclear ambitions.
However, what might the quid pro quo be for North Korea? Pyongyang would certainly like a suspension of periodic US-South Korea military exercises that, it fears, are designed to overthrow the Kim regime. Indeed, much of its nuclear rattling is designed as a deterrent to any potential attack by the US.
North Korea would like some tangible assurance about its security and the suspension of periodic Washington-Seoul military exercises might be a step in that direction. China has favored this course as a way to break the impasse.
However, the US might not be inclined to do this because Washington’s position appears to be that denuclearization of North Korea is the first and foremost issue. Therefore, Pyongyang would not be rewarded for blackmailing the region and the world with its nuclear arsenal.
It would depend on how desperate the North Korean situation is economically, and, if it is very bad, how much of a lifeline China would be prepared to extend.
So far, China has kept North Korea on a tight leash, maintaining it just short of a collapse to avoid hordes of North Korean refugees flooding into China. China wants North Korea as a buffer between US forces in South Korea, away from its borders; but it also wants North Korea to denuclearize.
Against this backdrop, Beijing has kept up the pressure on Pyongyang and it seems to be working, with Kim keen to hold a summit with Trump. At the same time he has softened South Korea, through his Winter Olympic diplomacy, to create a seemingly unified Korean position of seeking peace, although its nuclear arsenal is a major issue.
Short of Pyongyang’s moratorium on its nuclear program and a clear follow-up commitment to denuclearization, there is unlikely to be any breakthrough. Apart from the dramatic acceptance by Trump of Kim’s offer, there is not much happening by way of preparatory diplomatic groundwork.
Sushil Seth is a commentator based in Australia.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry