The third plenary session of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee approved a list of recommended leaders for national institutions, which it passed on for approval by this month’s sessions of the National People’s Congress and the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, along with constitutional amendments that allow President Xi Jinping (習近平) to become an “emperor.”
Xi mimics Mao Zedong (毛澤東), but lacks his confidence, because he cannot match Mao’s cultural foundation or his political achievements, still less his military ones.
Where Mao employed people from throughout China, Xi sticks to old friends and subordinates: He has placed people such as Wang Qishan (王岐山), Zhao Leji (趙樂際), Zhang Youxia (張又俠) and Li Zhanshu (栗戰書) in high positions, along with former subordinates from his days in Fujian and Zhejiang provinces, especially those from Zhejiang, where, as first secretary of the party’s provincial committee, he made all the key appointments.
In the wake of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre, CCP elder Peng Zhen (彭真) said: “We are all in one rickety boat, so we need to row together.”
A so-called “collective leadership” was instituted that involved the fair sharing of benefits and mutual compromises. Xi has upset this equilibrium.
Even Liu Yuan (劉源), son of former president Liu Shaoqi (劉少奇), and Liu Yazhou (劉亞洲), son-in-law of former president Li Xiannian (李先念), have been pressured into retiring from the military. Xi’s practice of putting his own clique in charge is bound to narrow the foundation of his rule, so it is no surprise that we often hear speculation about a military coup.
Xi’s future team will not be headed by himself and Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) or Li Zhanshu, who rank second and third in the Politburo Standing Committee. Rather, news emanating from Beijing suggests that it will be a triumvirate consisting of “Xi, Zhang and Zhao.”
“Zhang” means politburo member General Zhang Youxia (張又俠), vice chairman of the Central Military Commission, who took part in the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War. He is a native of Shaanxi Province, where Xi’s father, Xi Zhongxun (習仲勳), came from.
Zhang’s father was Zhang Zongxun (張宗遜), one of the People’s Republic of China’s founding generals, who was first vice commander of the party’s Northwest Field Army when Xi Zhongxun was a political commissar in the same army.
“Zhao” is Zhao Leji, who is a member of the Standing Committee of the 19th Politburo and secretary of the Central Commission for Disciplinary Inspection. Zhao is also a Shaanxi native. It is said that he and Xi met when they were sent to do farmwork in Shaanxi.
Zhao’s grandfather and Xi Zhongxun were fellow members of the Northwest Military-Adminstrative Commission. When Zhao was secretary of the CCP’s Shaanxi Provincial Committee, he demonstrated his loyalty by renovating “relics” related to Xi.
So, Xi stands at the center, flanked by these two men who have power over two of the controlling factors of the dictatorship: The military and judiciary. What this triumvirate lacks is anyone with expertise in economics. Economist Zhang Weiying (張維迎) is a native of Shaanxi Province, but his reformist ideas are too radical for Xi. Perhaps economist and politburo member Liu He (劉鶴) will be brought in to form a quadrumvirate.
Membership in Xi’s closest circle requires coming from Shaanxi. While Xi’s king-like status might be splendid, it is lonely and might not be an easy ride. Meanwhile, many new variables are emerging in China and around the world that call for a more collective approach.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs