The unveiling on Tuesday of a monthly pass that allows users to take unlimited rides on all Taipei and New Taipei City metro and bus lines, as well as free YouBike rides up to 30 minutes, has been welcomed in most parts of the Taipei metropolitan area, but some critics have blasted it as short-sighted and an electoral strategy.
Priced at NT$1,280 per month, the pass is a bargain for those who spend more than NT$42 per day on public transportation. New Taipei City residents who commute to the capital for work every day are expected to benefit most.
The Taipei Department of Transportation said it expects about 236,000 cards to be registered for the all-in-one transportation pass before it is officially launched on April 16.
Critics have said that the pass could put a dent in the already indebted state coffers and have asked why taxpayers should finance a policy that would only benefit public transportation users.
They have also questioned the motives of Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who is seeking re-election, for introducing the pass only a few months before the nine-in-one local elections scheduled for Nov. 24.
Elections are always a factor: They motivate most politicians to make sure that their policies appeal to voters or at least upset as few of them as possible. However, those who think the policy of limited benefit are perhaps too fixated on the immediate revenue loss to see the long-term social gains.
Taipei Rapid Transit Corp (TRTC) statistics showed that the two cities’ shared metro system recorded about 746 million rides last year.
The number might seem impressive at first glance, but it translates into just 113 rides per person per year, given that the two cities have a combined population of 6.6 million people. This means that on average, each resident takes the MRT once every three days.
A report published by the Ministry of Transportation and Communications in June last year also showed that, despite the city boasting the most convenient public transportation system in Taiwan, only 42.8 percent of Taipei residents used public transportation in 2016, followed by 39.8 percent of Keelung residents and 33.8 percent of New Taipei City’s.
There could be many reasons why people choose their cars or scooters over public transportation. Their choices could be informed by cost, convenience, comfort or even freedom. However, if local governments want to boost the number of people using public transportation, cost is the easiest, if not the only, factor they can directly influence.
It is true that the introduction of a fairly inexpensive monthly pass means less revenue for TRTC and the Taipei City Government, but taking more private cars off the road should reduce traffic congestion and, in turn, pollution.
Cleaner air means that less people would suffer from air pollution-related diseases, which over time could ease the financial burden on the National Health Insurance system.
Also, statistics from the National Police Agency found that in January alone, more than 6,000 people were injured and 12 were killed in road accidents in Taipei and New Taipei City. Having less cars on the road could reduce the number of traffic accidents. That means lower collective medical costs and less bereaved families.
Regardless of whether the monthly pass is a product of electioneering, a policy that might have long-lasting social benefits is one that should be welcomed.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under