Malaysia is just a few months or even weeks away from its most contentious election in decades.
Mahathir Mohamad — Malaysia’s longest-serving prime minister, whose rule ended in 2003 — is, at 92, working with opposition figures he once repressed to prevent his former protege, controversial Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, from securing another term.
However, breaking the 61-year winning streak of Mahathir’s former party, the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), is not going to be easy.
The pundits are still betting on Najib, with one pollster predicting that the incumbent could regain a two-thirds parliamentary majority, enabling him to amend the constitution.
Mahathir has just a few months to change the political dynamic, by leading the opposition coalition, Pakatan Harapan (PH), and replacing the Pan-Malaysia Islamic Party (PAS) with his new party, the Malaysia United Indigenous Party (PPBM), as the primary alternative to UMNO.
While the PAS has only about 15 percent electoral support, it has managed to push the UMNO to implement elements of its nationalist-religious agenda.
TOXIC ONE-UPMANSHIP
However, a strong enough showing by PH in the next election would expose the PAS as politically dispensable, potentially freeing Malaysia from a toxic game of Muslim one-upmanship.
The impact of that game should not be underestimated.
In recent years, religious intolerance has been on the rise in once-secular Malaysia.
For example, the Arabic word for God, Allah, widely used by Arab and Indonesian Christians, is now reserved for Muslim use only.
More alarming, the Malaysian Ministry of Home Affairs has banned a wide range of books, from the Indonesian translation of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species to the writings of the Islam-friendly Western academics John Esposito and Karen Armstrong.
The rise of a strict and exclusivist Islam in Malaysia reflects international trends and domestic dynamics.
Ethnic-majority Malays — who were marginalized during colonial times, but now enjoy constitutionally guaranteed preferential treatment in the economy and education — must, by definition, be Muslim. The persistence of their favored status hinges on the UMNO’s political dominance, or so UMNO claims.
While early UMNO leaders were anti-clerical, the party’s success in eliminating its leftist and liberal rivals left PAS as the face of the ethnic Malay opposition.
When the modernist Mahathir came to power in 1981, Islamism became the PAS’ most effective ideological weapon against the UMNO.
And, indeed, the PAS leader, Hadi Awang, then a young and charismatic cleric, advocated a radical stance, labeling any Muslim who supported the UMNO an “infidel,” because the UMNO government had supposedly “perpetuated the colonial constitution, infidel laws and pre-Islamic rules.”
Hadi’s message helped to create a deep divide between the two “kinds” of Muslims, to the extent that villages would have two mosques, two cemeteries, and two clerics to lead prayers and officiate at ceremonies.
However, where Hadi did the most damage was in undermining the legitimacy of Malaysia’s post-colonial state and social structures. When Malaysia was under British rule, it faced mass immigration of ethnic Chinese and Indians, and the emergence of a Christian native minority on the island of Borneo.
REVISIONISM
From a Muslim nationalist’s perspective, pluralism — together with secularism and democracy — were colonial impositions. Full decolonization would demand restoration of the dominance of Islam and Muslims.
According to this narrative, the Ottoman Empire offers a model of segregated, unequal, but peaceful coexistence of multiple ethno-religious communities. Minorities lived autonomously in their millets, not as equal citizens, but as dhimmis, or protected minorities.
Having once championed the establishment of a full-fledged Muslim state, the PAS now demands at least expanding Shariah and elevating the status of the Syariah court system, which has limited jurisdiction over Muslims’ personal and family matters, to that of the civil courts.
As the PAS’ brand of Muslim religious nationalism has increasingly overridden the UMNO’s Malay ethno-nationalism, these goals have gained the support of a growing number of Muslims.
While not known to be religious, Mahathir in 1982 shrewdly co-opted Hadi’s more charismatic and visionary contemporary, Anwar Ibrahim, to spearhead the UMNO’s own Islamization projects.
From Islamic higher education to Islamic banking to religious bureaucracy, Mahathir and Anwar stole the PAS’ religious thunder — that is, until the UMNO split.
In 1998, Mahathir imprisoned Anwar, who had tried to replace him. After that, the PAS absorbed many of Anwar’s followers, expanding its influence from its stronghold in the north to the entire country.
Since the 2013 election, when Najib lost the popular vote, but clung to power thanks to electoral gerrymandering, he has worked to bring Hadi on side, for example, by facilitating the potential introduction of harsh hudud punishments (mandated by God under Islamic law) for crimes like adultery, drinking and apostasy.
It was a Machiavellian masterstroke that not only drew the PAS out of the opposition coalition, but also led Hadi to defend the scandal-plagued Najib.
SEAT STRATEGY
The PAS has announced plans to contest about 60 percent of parliamentary constituencies. This might siphon Malay votes from PH, giving the UMNO many narrow victories.
If the turnout among Malays is low, PH will suffer more than Najib, who could end up winning more seats with even fewer votes than in 2013.
As for the PAS, its continued political relevance hinges on eliminating the threat posed by Mahathir and its own splinter party, Amanah, formed by pro-Anwar moderates.
If Mahathir cannot secure one-third of the seats in parliament, the PAS can claim that it is indispensable, even if it loses every constituency.
In such a scenario, no Malay opposition leader would dare denounce the PAS’ Muslim nationalism. The UMNO, despite its electoral victory, would have even less of the moral courage needed to block the PAS agenda.
If Mahathir does secure one-third of the parliament, Malaysian politics will undergo significant changes, even if the UMNO remains technically in charge. If Amanah can supplant the PAS as the main Muslim party, the trend toward religious extremism would likely be reversed.
If the PPBM is established as a rival defender of Malays’ favored status, the UMNO would lose its monopoly on the issue, making Malaysian politics more competitive.
So far, Malaysia’s nonagenarian comeback kid has been making inroads in many UMNO and PAS constituencies.
However, Malays alone will not decide the outcome of his battle with the PAS and Najib. As many marginal constituencies are ethnically mixed, low turnout among non-Malays might help the PAS — and hurt Malaysia.
Wong Chin-Huat is a political scientist at the Penang Institute in Malaysia.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry