Last week saw leaders around the world trying to remember whether they were meant to take US President Donald Trump seriously, but not literally, or literally, but not seriously, and also wondering if they have a Greg Norman somewhere they could use.
When Trump announced early in the week he was going to levy a 25 percent tariff on steel and a 15 percent tariff on aluminum imports, he suggested it was to protect national security.
As with most Trump utterances, it left everyone trying to decipher just what he meant, because the US imports nearly half its steel from four nations — Canada, Brazil, South Korea and Mexico — which are hardly enemies of the US.
Was he doing this to attack China?
He did write a series of tweets that suggested trade with China is in his sights, but while China is the biggest producer of steel, it only exports a small percentage of it to the US.
Some of his other tweets suggested that Trump was instead targeting Europe, but again, hitting steel imports was an odd way to go about it — given Europe made it quickly obvious that it would retaliate with tariffs of its own — and the EU is one of the few economies with enough grunt not to get pushed around by the US.
Then came the suggestion that Trump was using this to negotiate with Canada and Mexico over the North American Free Trade Agreement — but that was also odd because that shot down his national security reasoning and opened the US up to retaliation under WTO rules (which would be likely anyway, given his national security reasoning was clearly bogus).
Using the threat of increasing tariffs in free-trade negotiations is a weird way to go about things.
The tariffs do hurt the nations that export steel and aluminum to the US, because they force them to charge more for their product, thereby giving US steel companies an advantage, but they also hurt the US.
Tariffs are effectively consumption taxes designed to give local industries an advantage (or at least an equal footing with international competitors) and they work by raising the price of imports.
Now that is great for the owners and possibly workers of those industries, but not so good for anyone else who wants to buy those goods, because now they have to pay more.
A tariff on steel and aluminum imports might help create a few extra jobs in the steel industry, but it also increases the price of all things made with steel and aluminum.
That leads to job losses in those industries and also reduces the living standards for everyone because suddenly they have to pay more for things such as canned goods, beer and cars.
One study suggested that for every job gained in the steel and aluminum industries, five would be lost elsewhere.
That does not mean all free trade is a win for everyone — and international trade does not occur in a textbook, but rather in the real world where governments subsidize and assist industries.
However, the general rule is that the costs to the economy increase with the size of the tariff and the number of industries affected (and similarly the benefits of lowering them reduce as the tariff gets closer to zero).
A 25 percent tariff on steel is therefore a rather hefty whack.
Trump is in effect going to the negotiating table with a massive weapon — a bit like taking a gun to a knife fight. The only problem is he has the gun aimed at his own foot.
So it was not a total surprise to see Trump back down and exempt Canada and Mexico, and then later give one to Australia.
As Australian Minister for Trade and Investment Steve Ciobo noted this week, Australian steel exports to the US amount to about 0.8 percent of the US market and aluminum exports account for about 1.5 percent — so exempting Australia makes little difference.
To that end, reports that Australia has engaged golfer and entrepreneur Greg Norman to do some lobbying on the nation’s behalf seem eminently sensible.
Not because Norman is some master trade negotiator, but because when dealing with Trump, nations always need to realize he is an insecure, ego-driven fool who needs praise for doing the most ordinary of activities, and who sees every discussion and issue through the prism of how it makes him look.
Norman is probably the only Australian Trump has heard of, and the fact that Norman is famous and successful and would be seeking a favor from Trump would appeal to Trump’s vanity.
Australia could bemoan the fact that the US electoral college system has selected this vainglorious ignoramus, or it can suck it up and use it to its advantage.
For now it appears his bluster of leveling tariffs for everyone is weakening.
Trump clearly believes this is the best way to negotiate trade deals — like any good swindler he will ignore the costs and talk only of the benefits.
The danger for Australia has always been not from a direct US tariff, but should retaliation come from Europe and China.
The last thing a small, open economy needs is for the large economies of the world to start playing like it is 1930.
For now everyone is trying to work out just what Trump is after — mostly he is after things that he can call a win (even if they are really not).
So nations will be thinking of things they can give Trump that do not matter so that he can claim victory in the negotiation, or they can see if Greg Norman is available for hire.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.