US President Donald Trump’s nationalist trade adviser, White House National Trade Council Director Peter Navarro, has staged a startling comeback.
Last year, he nearly disappeared from view when his small operation was subsumed under the White House’s National Economic Council, headed by his rival, Gary Cohn, the free-trader who was president of Goldman Sachs.
Now, Cohn is on his way out, while the steel and aluminum tariffs that Navarro advocates have become national policy.
He might even take over Cohn’s job.
It “absolutely” could happen, said Harry Kazianis, a friend of Navarro who is director of defense studies at the Center for the National Interest. “Trump’s going to look to Peter and say: ‘I know this guy. I can trust him.’”
One factor behind Navarro’s surprising resurrection is that Trump has this year taken renewed interest in trade and national security — Navarro’s issues — after last year having focused on healthcare and tax cuts.
The second factor is that Navarro is as relentless as a honey badger. He was last week repeatedly in front of television cameras championing the tariffs, which Trump signed on Thursday.
After losing to Cohn in the White House turf wars, someone else might have packed up and gone home to California. Instead, Navarro kept working the issues and building the case for stronger action.
Even now he is not letting up, said Michael Wessel, a steelworker representative who speaks with him regularly.
“He is certainly excited about where he is and what’s going on, because he has worked a long time to get here, but he’s running at warp speed and probably doesn’t have much time to think about it,” Wessel said.
Free-trade supporters are elbowing each other aside to express their dismay about Navarro’s ascendancy — and Navarro welcomes their disdain. Although he holds a doctorate in economics from Harvard University and taught the subject at the University of California-Irvine’s Paul Merage School of Business, Navarro accuses his fellow economists of blindly adhering to free-trade principles at the expense of national security.
“The president said very clearly that we can’t have a country without steel and aluminum industries, and I totally agree with him,” Navarro told Bloomberg TV on Wednesday last week.
Echoing Trump, he added: “All the countries that trade with us are getting the better part of the deal.”
He also said he is not on the list of candidates to replace Cohn.
Today’s Navarro has a monkish demeanor. He is wiry, almost gaunt. Running shoes by the door of his office attest to his habit of running to work. He works such long hours that he stifled a laugh when a Bloomberg TV interviewer asked him about his “day” job. His closest administration ally is US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, a fellow trade nationalist.
Navarro’s not-so-secret weapon in the White House turf wars is that he has a lot in common with the president. They are about the same age: Navarro is 68 and Trump 71, and neither backs down from a fight.
“Peter has always been a contrarian, someone who’s never been afraid to defend his views vociferously,” Alliance for American Manufacturing president Scott Paul said.
Most importantly, both Navarro and Trump are former Democrats who feel no compunction to stick to Republican orthodoxy on trade.
Navarro was actually a kind of liberal once. He served in the Peace Corps, surfed and later campaigned against uncontrolled real-estate development in the race for mayor of San Diego in 1992 — ironic now that he is working for the world’s most famous developer.
One poster for his 1996 congressional race read: “Peter Navarro. The Democrat Newt Gingrich fears most!”
Speaking to Bloomberg on Wednesday last week, Navarro heaped praise on his boss and described his own role as that of an enabler.
“This is the president’s vision,” Navarro said. “My function, really, as an economist is to try to provide the underlying analytics that confirm his intuition, and his intuition is always right in these matters.”
He compared the White House to the successful New England Patriots football team, saying: “The owner, the coach and the quarterback are all the president. The rest of us are all interchangeable parts.”
The interchangeable part labeled Peter Navarro got off to a strong start last year, when Trump pulled the US out of negotiations on the 12-country Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, one of his first acts in office.
Navarro also spearheaded Trump’s “Buy American, Hire American” initiative, which tightens enforcement of federal procurement rules and cracks down on alleged abuse of H-1B visas and other foreign-hiring programs.
In April last year, Trump called Navarro “one of the greats at trying to protect our jobs.”
Then Navarro started to fade from view. Trump turned his attention to the unsuccessful effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act and after that raced to get tax cuts passed by the end of the year. John Kelly arrived as White House chief of staff at the end of July and restricted access to the Oval Office. In September, Kelly folded Navarro’s office into the National Economic Council. Navarro was required to copy his new boss, Cohn, on e-mails. He was not invited on Trump’s state visit to China in November.
However, Navarro never stopped pushing his agenda, which intertwines economics and military readiness and puts China at the heart of US policy. He pressed the US Department of Defense to seek increased funding for Abrams tanks and Bradley Fighting Vehicles, in part to keep open the factories in Ohio and Pennsylvania that make them, said Wessel, who represents United Steelworkers president Leo Gerard and is a congressional appointee on the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission.
He also argued successfully for the Pentagon to seek funding for another littoral combat ship, again to keep the shipyards where they are made afloat.
In addition, Navarro was behind Trump’s executive order requiring a broad review of the country’s defense industrial base. It is due next month, Wessel said.
Navarro has come a long way from his roots as a mainstream economist. He supported free trade in a 1984 book The Policy Game: How Special Interests and Ideologues Are Stealing America, arguing that tariffs “protected the profits of a small core of domestic industries” while harming consumers.
He has said that because “the globalist erosion of the American economy” was just getting started, he had not recognized it then.
By 1993, he was expressing some misgivings, referring to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), as “SHAFTA.” By the 2000s, China was on his radar.
He concluded that it owed its success to unfair trading practices. In 2006, he published The Coming China Wars: Where They Will Be Fought, How They Will Be Won. In 2011 he wrote Death by China: Confronting the Dragon — A Global Call to Action with Greg Autry, which argued that the US and China are on a trajectory for armed conflict.
Navarro essentially barged into the China-watcher community without an invitation.
“Navarro is not known in any China circles,” James McGregor, a former chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, told Foreign Policy last year.
However, it was Death by China that caught Trump’s attention.
Trump provided a blurb for a 2012 documentary film based on the book that said: “Right on... I urge you to see it.” The trailer features a knife, representing China, that is plunged into a red, white and blue map of the US. Blood leaks from the tricolor corpse.
“He gets criticized for the Death by China meme, but he’s been way more correct about China than almost any other observer,” Paul said.
Plenty of observers would not agree with Paul that Navarro is correct on China, or much of anything else. That is unlikely to bother someone who has followed a convoluted path to power and who revels in his outsider role: the economist and self-made China expert who is regarded with suspicion by other economists and China experts. In Trump’s White House, none of that hurts him a bit.
An article on the Nature magazine Web site reports that 22 scientists last month wrote to the daily Dagens Nyheter criticizing Sweden’s no-lockdown response to COVID-19. However, evidence-based analysis shows that a lockdown is not a one-size-fits-all strategy and Sweden is showing the world a sustainable way for everybody to fearlessly live with the virus, which is an inevitable situation that everyone must face and accept for a while. The biggest myth about lockdowns is that they are the only solution when an epidemic worsens. A lockdown is a measure to cordon off a seriously affected area so that people in
On Monday, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) spoke during the opening ceremony of this year’s World Health Assembly (WHA). For the first time in the assembly’s history, attendees, including Xi, had to dial in virtually. Xi made no acknowledgement of the Chinese government’s role in causing the COVID-19 pandemic, nor was there any meaningful apology. Instead, he painted China as a benign force for good and a friend to all nations. Except Taiwan, of course. The address was a reheated version of the speech Xi gave at the 2017 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Xi again attempted to step into the