The Chinese National People’s Congress is due to approve the removal of presidential term limits tomorrow, making Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Secretary-General Xi Jinping (習近平) the most powerful Chinese leader in decades.
Today is the 59th anniversary of a key uprising in Lhasa, Tibet, against CCP rule, the culmination of an armed rebellion that began in 1956 in the Kham region of eastern Tibet and gradually spread into the center of the country, leading the Dalai Lama to flee into exile on March 17, 1959.
It is also the 10th anniversary of another uprising in Lhasa by thousands of Buddhist monks and others against the CCP, one triggered by Beijing’s efforts to turn Tibetans into a minority in their own land and further restrict their language, culture and religion.
It was probably with those three dates in mind that Wang Guosheng (王國生), CCP secretary of the 14th Dalai Lama’s birthplace, Qinghai Province, on Wednesday told reporters on the sidelines of the congress that Tibetans living in Qinghai’s “herder areas” have said that Xi is a “living Bodhisattva.”
Despite the CCP’s massive propaganda campaign to paint Xi as a man of the people and the only one capable of leading China into a glorious future, it is hard to believe that anyone could believe Xi is someone either willing or capable of compassionate acts sufficient to achieve enlightenment — the definition of a Bodhisattva — or compassionate acts, period.
Wang’s claim is especially hard to swallow considering that the CCP sought to eradicate Buddhism among Tibetans for decades and Tibetan Buddhists consider the Dalai Lama, like his predecessors, to be the incarnation of Avalokitesvara, the Bodhisattva who embodies the compassion of all Buddhas.
If Xi were such a paragon, there would not have been yet another self-immolation protest by a Tibetan, this time on Wednesday in what used to be part of Tibet, but has been absorbed by Beijing into Sichuan Province. The International Campaign for Tibet said the man’s death was the 153rd self-immolation by a Tibetan since such protests began in 2009.
Wang’s claim was just another example of the sanctimonious claptrap emanating from Beijing as the rubber-stamp congress holds its annual session, just like Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi’s (王毅) claims that recognizing Beijing’s “one China” principle is an “irresistible trend” or that “everything will operate in the sunshine” when it comes to Xi’s Belt and Road Initiative.
The Human Rights Network for Tibet and Taiwan and others are to march in downtown Taipei today to commemorate the anniversaries of the rebellions in Tibet. There is also an exhibition in the city’s Liberty Square commemorating the 2008 uprising.
Given Xi’s ambitions to leave his mark on China, and the growing petulance among many in China that Taiwanese continue to spurn their calls for unification, it is worth taking a moment today to remember what this day means to a majority of Tibetans and what Tibet’s fate could herald for Taiwan if Beijing ever takes over.
As New Power Party Legislator Freddy Lim (林昶佐), who heads the Taiwan Parliamentary Group for Tibet, said this week, the Chinese government has been suppressing minority groups in the country in every possible aspect: culture, languages, arts and the environment.
What the CCP has done in Tibet, to the Uighurs in Xinjiang and to others is exactly what it would do to Taiwan.
Beijing should also take note of the historical importance of this day, for the Tibetan anniversaries also show that, despite the CCP’s decades of intimidation, torture and murder, or its economic bribes over the past few years, it has failed to eradicate Buddhism in Tibet or Tibetans’ faith in the Dalai Lama.
That alone is proof that there is nothing irresistible about the CCP, or Xi.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.