Thu, Mar 08, 2018 - Page 8 News List

Competition key to industry growth

By Edmund Phelps

From the early 19th century to the early 20th century, Western countries attributed their economic growth to the discoveries of “scientists and navigators.” A country needed only the “zeal” to develop “obvious” commercial applications and build the facilities to meet demand for new products.

Until recently, Chinese believed the same thing, but now, Chinese businesspeople and entrepreneurs are increasingly showing not only the entrepreneurial drive to adapt to new opportunities, but also the desire and capacity to innovate for themselves, rather than simply copying what is already out there.

More Chinese companies are realizing that they must innovate to get — and stay — ahead in the global economy. Several companies — notably Alibaba, Baidu and Tencent — made breakthroughs by offering digital-age infrastructure that facilitates innovative activity, and industrial firms have recently moved into the business of robots and artificial intelligence.

For its part, China’s government is evidently supportive of Chinese businesses developing a capacity to produce indigenous innovations. It no doubt recognizes that such innovations are all the more valuable when innovation remains weak in the West, where growth in total factor productivity (TFP) has continued its long slowdown.

In the past few years, China’s government has introduced initiatives aimed at increasing both entrepreneurship and innovation. It has shortened dramatically the process for forming a new company. It has built a vast number of schools, where Chinese children learn more about the world they are to face, and it recently facilitated the entry of foreign experts to work on new projects in the business sector.

The authorities have also recognized the importance of allowing more competition in the economy. Individuals should be freed up to start new companies and existing companies should be freed up to enter new industries. Competition solves a lot of problems — a point that is increasingly lost on the West.

At the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in January in Davos, Switzerland, Chinese officials discussed basic reforms that the government introduced two years ago to increase competition.

Under the new policy, excess capacity now signals that supply should be allowed to contract and prompt redundant firms to exit the market. Of course, excess demand signals that supply should be allowed to increase, leading to the entry of new firms.

The key insight is that when existing enterprises are protected from new market entrants bearing new ideas, the result will be less innovation and less “adaptation” to a changing world, to use Friedrich Hayek’s term.

Another argument can be made. In any modern economy, virtually every industry operates in the face of a largely unknowable future. The more companies an industry has thinking about a problem, the more likely a solution is to be found.

A company that has been kept out of an industry might know something that all the companies in the industry do not, or some unique experience might have furnished an individual with “personal knowledge” that is impossible to transmit to others who have not had the same experience.

Whatever the case, society benefits — through lower prices, more jobs, better products and services, and so forth — when outsiders with something to add are free to do so.

This story has been viewed 1469 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top