The powerful earthquake that struck Hualien on Feb. 6 raises the question of whether the earthquake resistance of buildings is affected by the demolition of interior masonry walls in the course of interior renovations.
Article 77 of the Building Act (建築法) stipulates: “The ownership holder and the user of a building shall maintain the legal usage as well as the structure and equipment safety of the building.”
However, it is common, after large buildings are completed, for users or renovators to knock down interior masonry walls, columns or beams, or to remove floor slabs without authorization, thus damaging the original structural system and misusing it.
The Act stipulates that the use of a building cannot be altered without applying for a usage license.
However, Article 9, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 4 of the act defines “repair” as “repair or alteration by [more than] half of any of the foundation, beams and columns, bearing walls, floor slabs, roof truss or roof structures.”
The use of the phrase “[more than] half” in the wording of the act is problematic, as it can mislead unscrupulous renovators or other members of the public to think that if a building has plenty of columns or masonry walls, it does not matter if one, two or several of them are removed.
The National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering has issued a warning about buildings constructed more than 20 years ago that incorporate covered walkways that are only supported by columns, saying that the design regulations in force when they were built were not as rigorous as they are now.
The center said that if the buildings are close to seismic faults, their first stories might be too soft or weak to resist the force of an earthquake, and when interior renovations are done on such buildings, it is vital not to damage the existing weight-bearing masonry walls, beams and columns.
Crucially, it said that buildings up to five stories tall that were built before the 921 Earthquake of 1999 and contain many interior masonry walls were able to withstand the power of the earthquake when it struck, even though their structure was not specifically designed to be earthquake resistant.
Considering the role played by such interior walls, they should definitely not be demolished without making structural assessments.
Interior decoration and repairs must comply with the Regulations for the Management of Interior Decoration and Repair of Buildings (建築物室內裝修管理辦法), but the regulations contain a legal loophole, as they do not explicitly prohibit damage to architectural structures.
Article 23 of the regulations lists the forms, documents, plans and illustrations that need to be attached to any application for a review of proposed interior renovations.
However, there is no wording to the effect that internal masonry walls, beams and columns cannot be demolished without first conducting a structural analysis. Consequently, it is common for such structures to be knocked down during renovations without any assessment having been made. The regulations should be amended to remedy this flaw.
Article 26 of the regulations stipulates that the responsible local authority or reviewing department should review applications with regard to three items: whether there is a complete set of illustrations and documents, whether the renovation materials and interior wall structures comply with technical standards for construction and whether the proposed renovations would obstruct or damage fire prevention and escape equipment, firewalls and the main structure of the building.
However, these regulations omit the crucial point that weight-bearing walls, beams, columns and floor slabs must not be damaged. How can people judge what the main structure is, if it is not defined? It must be asked whether this legislative omission has caused buildings to be damaged in a way that impairs their original earthquake resistance.
Article 77-2 of the Building Act stipulates: “The central competent authority may authorize the architect association or other related professional technical organizations to perform examination.”
However, when money and time are limited, it is doubtful whether proposed alterations to interior masonry walls, beams and columns are properly reviewed.
In practice, regarding the item of “no encumbrance or damage to the main structure,” the relevant form-filling involves checking one out of two boxes marked “complies” and “no change, the same as originally approved.” It would be better to do categorized reviews on different categories of buildings.
In view of the recent spate of earthquakes, the Building Act and the Regulations for the Management of the Interior Decoration and Repairs of Buildings should be amended as soon as possible to deter people from making improper renovations that cause structural damage to buildings and make their lower stories too soft or weak.
Better safeguards would ensure that buildings continue to have the degree of earthquake resistance that they were originally planned to have.
Su Nan is a professor in National Yunlin University of Science and Technology’s civil and construction engineering department.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs