After Beijing’s one-man leadership was consolidated at the 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) Lunar New Year greeting drew a lot of attention from China experts around the world and set off a great deal of speculation.
“We should break new ground in our great social revolution, strengthen ourselves in the great self-reform and open a new chapter on our vast land in the great struggle of more than 1.3 billion Chinese people,” Xi said.
What does he intend by bringing up the word “revolution” again, and what are the goals he wants to achieve? Taiwan must come up with a precise interpretation of this in response to coming adjustments and challenges in cross-strait relations.
Qiushi (“Seeking Truth”), a political theory periodical published by the CCP, offered further interpretation of Xi’s speech in an article titled: “Promoting the great social revolution through the party’s self-revolution.”
People in democratic countries must think that China exists in a parallel universe with a different way of thinking. Even the Chinese themselves have hardly heard such a tone over the past 40 years, and the younger generation is certainly unfamiliar with it.
Many observers percieve this as a major political shift from late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) and his introduction of reform and openness following his 1992 inspection tour of southern China, which was followed by the rule of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and Jiang’s successor Hu Jintao (胡錦濤).
Xi is following the route of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). His actions since he came to power in 2012, his respect for and worship of Mao, and that he compares himself to Mao, have made this evident.
However, eyebrows were raised when he announced China’s direction for this year at the Lunar New Year party. Xi’s talk about a “new era” borrows a lot from Mao and moves away from, or even rejects, the political line that Deng, Jiang and Hu followed.
With the CCP once again assuming the mantle of a “revolutionary party,” Xi is stressing the legitimacy of his rule as a politician of the so-called “red second generation,” while indicating that the Chinese government is about to take a left turn.
While the former implication is political in nature and the latter economic, the two are often complementary. This is the same trick that Mao used when he incited power struggles not only against political rivals, but also between social classes.
Hence, many observers believe that, as Xi now has supreme power, he will continue to crack down on those whose views differ from his own in order to maintain a sense of security.
Meanwhile, in the face of the internal crises caused by a widening income gap, as well as increasingly rigid social structures, he might have no better solution than Mao did and could have to borrow Mao’s strategies.
Instead of waiting for the public to launch a revolution, he might initiate one in order to shift political accountability.
Given how tightly controlled China is, more information is needed before anyone can judge whether Xi’s approach could be persuasive. However, for Taiwan, it is not good when China’s leader decides to move from “reform” toward “revolution.”
It might be necessary for Taiwanese to review each and every approach it has taken when handling cross-strait political dialogue and administrative exchanges over the past two decades to enhance the strategies while ensuring national security.
Tzou Jiing-wen is the editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper).
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
On Jan. 13, Taiwan, backed by democratic individuals, groups and countries worldwide, succeeded to uphold democracy in the face of formidable challenges and threats posed by the semi-powerful communism and authoritarianism of the People’s Republic of China. It is time for Taiwan and president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to reciprocate. Taiwan is uniquely positioned to work with Afghan democrats and democracies worldwide, which could pave the way for democracy’s resurgence in Afghanistan. Taiwan has always stirred feelings of curiosity and admiration among Afghans. They are majorly sympathetic toward Taiwan’s cause of freedom, independence and democracy. Afghans also share Taiwan’s resilience, yet