This year marks the 71st anniversary of the 228 Incident, which started after one of two Tobacco Monopoly Bureau agents confiscating contraband cigarettes in Taipei on Feb. 27, 1947, hit an illegal vendor on the head, fired his gun into the crowd and killed a bystander.
The conflict quickly spread across Taiwan and the Taiwan Provincial Administrative Executive Office used its colonial rule to placate the public by negotiating with the local gentry, while asking for military assistance from Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), then based in Nanjing.
After the troops arrived, they started a massacre across Taiwan and arrested many local leaders, while also taking the opportunity to kill Taiwanese intellectuals and members of the cultural and social elite.
Taiwan’s post-war tragedy began when the nation was not given its independence immediately after the end of the World War II and it had to submit to occupation by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime. The 228 Massacre is a horrifying historical monument to death and destruction. The Taiwanese public, having looked forward to being part of the “Motherland” and having just celebrated the return of the Republic of China, was left with a wound that would never heal.
Forty years after the Incident, the public, rather than the government, launched the 228 Justice and Peace Movement, and it took another 10 years for the government, represented by then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), to apologize to the victims.
Following the 228 Incident, the KMT regime, led by Chiang Kai-shek and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), used martial law to suppress Taiwanese society for a long time. However, the massacre resulted in an accumulation of energy just waiting to explode: the dream of a Taiwan independent from China.
People used to metaphorically speak of the successive colonial governments of Imperial Japan and the KMT, saying that “after the dogs left, the pigs came.”
Fleeing from China, the KMT regime demanded that the Taiwanese public join the fight against communism and to retake China.
Yet the KMT has never sincerely faced the tragic consequences of the 228 Massacre, nor does it ever reflect on its guilt and past misconduct. The KMT never intended to establish a genuinely democratic and free Taiwan, but rather aspired to consolidate its party-state regime, a mentality that remains even after Feb. 28 was designated a public memorial day to commemorate one of the most painful anti-government protests by Taiwanese.
After using the fight against communism as an excuse to implement decades of martial law, and although democracy and freedom have become part of Taiwan’s mainstream political values and there is hope of Taiwan rebuilding itself as a new nation, the KMT ingratiates itself with the People’s Republic of China, which still intends to annex the KMT’s “China.”
The shadow of the 228 nightmare continues to loom over Taiwan and it will not disappear because of a public memorial day.
Having undergone Japanese colonization and the subsequent semi-colonization by the KMT’s Chinese regime, Taiwan’s modern and contemporary history bears countless agonizing imprints of different foreign regimes.
The political and cultural lessons for the public are to reflect upon history, remember the wounds of past shackles and construct a genuine Taiwanese identity.
People who dream of establishing a normal and sound sovereign state in Taiwan, while still commemorating the Incident, should transform the wounds and scars inflicted by successive colonizers into a badge of honor that bears the memory of their perpetual pursuit of independence.
Those who came to Taiwan in exile, with the dream of a new country, should abandon the traditional views of persecutor and victim and work together toward the establishment of a new nation and a shared community, as members of which they can proudly wear the same badge of honor.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.