During a meeting of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on Feb. 15, US Senator Marco Rubio asked US Acting Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Susan Thornton about the disappearance of the Republic of China’s (ROC) flag from the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs’ new Web site. Thornton said: “We don’t recognize, of course, Taiwan as an independent country and we don’t recognize the flag of the ROC as a country where we have official relations. Our policy is to not display the flag of the ROC on US official government Web sites.”
Taiwan’s pan-blue media picked up on the story and interpreted the flag’s removal as evidence that the US-Taiwan relationship is degenerating under President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration. This is not the case: The correct explanation is that US discourse on Taiwan is becoming clearer.
On Jan. 1, 1979, the US broke formal diplomatic ties with the ROC. Since the US no longer recognizes the ROC, the flag that represents the ROC should be removed from all US government Web sites.
To this day, the ROC claims sovereignty over China, Mongolia and Taiwan. Therefore, if the ROC flag were to remain on US government Web sites, visitors would be left with the impression that the US acknowledges Taiwan to be part of China, as represented by the ROC.
US-Taiwan relations began when the US in 1979 switched its diplomatic recognition from the ROC to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The US’ Taiwan Relations Act has been the basis of this relationship.
The act is a piece of domestic US legislation, but what many observers outside of the US do not realize is that the cornerstone of the act is the 1952 Treaty of San Francisco. The treaty does not treat Taiwan as a part of China, but it does not state to which country Taiwan — then called “Formosa” — should be returned, simply calling on Japan to relinquish its claim of sovereignty.
Since Taiwan does not belong to China, Taiwan is not a matter of China’s “internal affairs,” as Beijing likes to claim. Neither does it encroach on China’s sovereignty. Based on the peace treaty, the US has a right to speak and make decisions on the matter.
Following the switch of diplomatic recognition, US discourse on Taiwan was at first rather vague, because the act was drafted in such a way as to deliberately avoid the question of Taiwan’s sovereign status.
Furthermore, as a condition of opening diplomatic relations with China, the US had to acknowledge China’s position that “Taiwan is a part of China,” although it remains unclear whether the US actually did so.
In March 2007, then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) applied for the nation to become a UN member state under the name “Taiwan.”
However, then-UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon sparked a dispute when he rejected Chen’s application based on UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, which, according to Ban, established that Taiwan was part of China.
Various nations, including the US, Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, raised objections, and under pressure from the US government, Ban finally admitted that he had made a mistake and agreed that the UN would never again use the phrase “Taiwan is part of China.”
This had the result of further clarifying the US-Taiwan and US-China relationships, but it also strengthened the legal foundation of the act.
There is now clear blue water between the US’ “one China” policy and China’s “one China” principle. Washington has crowned its “one China” policy as “our ‘one China’ policy,” with this gradually becoming common parlance among US officials when discussing and making statements about Taiwan and China.
On Feb. 9 last year, US President Donald Trump had a 45-minute telephone conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to the official White House transcript, “President Trump agreed, at the request of President Xi, to honor our ‘one China’ policy.” The US’ official position that “Taiwan is not part of China” was made even clearer.
As such, the continued appearance of the ROC flag — which represents China, Mongolia and Taiwan — on US government Web sites has become a contradiction and is illogical. This is why it was correct of Washington to remove the flag from the bureau’s Web site.
US discourse on Taiwan is becoming clearer: Taiwan is just Taiwan. It is not part of China, and it is even less a part of the ROC’s territorial construct of China, Mongolia and Taiwan.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser and former managing director and chairman of First Commercial Bank.
Translated by Edward Jones
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs